Loading...
8 results
Search Results
Now showing 1 - 8 of 8
- Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: initial experience of patients undergoing pulmonary thromboendarterectomyPublication . Plácido, Rui; Guimarães, Tatiana; Jenkins, David; Cortez-Dias, Nuno; Couto Pereira, Sara Cristina; Campos, Paula; Mineiro, Ana; Lousada, Nuno; Martins, Susana; Moreira, Susana; Dias, Ana Rocha; Resende, Catarina; Vieira, Rita; Pinto, Fausto J.Introduction and objectives: Pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) is a potentially curative procedure in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). This study reports the initial experience of a Portuguese PH center with patients undergoing PEA at an international surgical reference center. Methods: Prospective observational study of consecutive CTEPH patients followed at a national PH center, who underwent PEA at an international surgical reference center between October 2015 and March 2019. Clinical, functional, laboratory, imaging and hemodynamic parameters were obtained in the 12 months preceding the surgery and repeated between four and six months after PEA. Results: 27 consecutive patients (59% female) with a median age of 60 (49-71) years underwent PEA. During a median follow-up of 34 (21-48) months, there was an improvement in functional class in all patients, with only one cardiac death. From a hemodynamic perspective, there was a reduction in mean pulmonary artery pressure from 48 (42-59) mmHg to 26 (22-38) mmHg, an increase in cardiac output from 3.3 (2.9-4.0) L/min to 4.9 (4.2-5.5) L/min and a reduction in pulmonary vascular resistance from 12.1 (7.2-15.5) uW to 3.5 (2.6-5,2) uW. During the follow-up, 44% (n=12) of patients had no PH criteria, 44% (n=12) had residual PH and 11% (n=3) had PH recurrence. There was a reduction of N-terminal pro-B-type natriureticpeptide from 868 (212-1730) pg/mL to 171 (98-382) pg/mL. Rright ventricular systolic function parameters revealed an improvement in longitudinal systolic excursion and peak velocity of the plane of the tricuspid ring from 14 (13-14) mm and 9 (8-10) cm/s to 17 (16-18) mm and 13 (11-15) cm/s, respectively. Of the 26 patients with preoperative right ventricular dysfunction, 85% (n=22) recovered. The proportion of patients on specific vasodilator therapy decreased from 93% to 44% (p<0.001) and the proportion of those requiring oxygen therapy decreased from 52% to 26% (p=0.003). The six-minute walk test distance increased by about 25% compared to the baseline and only eight patients had significant desaturation during the test. Conclusion: Pulmonary endarterectomy performed at an experienced high-volume center is a safe procedure with a very favorable medium-term impact on functional, hemodynamic and right ventricular function parameters in CTEPH patients with operable disease. It is possible for PH centers without PEA differentiation to refer patients safely and effectively to an international surgical center in which air transport is necessary.
- Association of LDL-cholesterol with prognosis in patients admitted for acutely decompensated heart failurePublication . Brito, Joana; Rin, João; Duarte, Catarina; Couto Pereira, Sara Cristina; Morais, Pedro; Cunha, Nelson; Ferreira, Diogo; Santos, Rafael; Rigueira, Joana; Pinto, Fausto J.; Brito, DulceIntroduction and objectives: The association of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and prognosis in patients with heart failure (HF) remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of LDL-C in patients admitted for acutely decompensated HF and establish a safety cut-off value in this population. Methods: This retrospective, observational study included 167 consecutive patients admitted for acute HF. LDL-C levels were measured on hospital admission, and patients were categorized according to their estimated cardiovascular (CV) risk. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at one-year, while secondary endpoints included HF hospitalizations, major thrombotic events, and net clinical benefit. Results: During the follow-up period, 14.4% of patients died. Higher LDL-C levels were independently associated with improved survival, with a 4-fold increase in survival probability for each 1 mg/dL increase in serum LDL-C. The minimum LDL-C value not associated with increased mortality risk was 88 mg/dL. Patients with LDL-C below this cut-off had a significantly higher risk of mortality and a tendency for higher HF hospitalization risk. The net clinical benefit endpoint was also influenced by LDL-C levels, with LDL-C below 88 mg/dL associated with an increased risk of events. Conclusion: In patients admitted for acutely decompensated HF, higher LDL-C levels were associated with reduced risk of mortality. An LDL-C value below 88 mg/dL was associated with increased mortality, suggesting the need for a more liberal LDL-C target in this specific patient population. These findings highlight the importance of considering LDL-C levels in the management and risk assessment of patients with HF.
- The value of multiparametric prediction scores in heart failure varies with the type of follow‐up after discharge: a comparative analysisPublication . Rodrigues, Tiago; Agostinho, João R.; Santos, Rafael; Cunha, Nelson; Silvério António, Pedro; Couto Pereira, Sara Cristina; Brito, Joana; Valente Silva, Beatriz; Silva, Pedro; Rigueira, Joana; Pinto, Fausto J.; Brito, DulceAims: Multiple prediction score models have been validated to predict major adverse events in patients with heart failure. However, these scores do not include variables related to the type of follow-up. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a protocol-based follow-up programme of patients with heart failure regarding scores accuracy for predicting hospitalizations and mortality occurring during the first year after hospital discharge. Methods and results: Data from two heart failure populations were collected: one composed of patients included in a protocol-based follow-up programme after an index hospitalization for acute heart failure and a second one-the control group-composed of patients not included in a multidisciplinary HF management programme after discharge. For each patient, the risk of hospitalization and/or mortality within a period of 12 months after discharge was calculated using four different scores: BCN Bio-HF Calculator, COACH Risk Engine, MAGGIC Risk Calculator, and Seattle Heart Failure Model. The accuracy of each score was established using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration graphs, and discordance calculation. AUC comparison was established by the DeLong method. The protocol-based follow-up programme group included 56 patients, and the control group, 106 patients, with no significant differences between groups (median age: 67 years vs. 68.4 years; male sex: 58% vs. 55%; median ejection fraction: 28.2% vs. 30.5%; functional class II: 60.7% vs. 56.2%, I: 30.4% vs. 31.9%; P = not significant). Hospitalization and mortality rates were significantly lower in the protocol-based follow-up programme group (21.4% vs. 54.7%; P < 0.001 and 5.4% vs. 17.9%; P < 0.001, respectively). When applied to the control group, COACH Risk Engine and BCN Bio-HF Calculator had, respectively, good (AUC: 0.835) and reasonable (AUC: 0.712) accuracy to predict hospitalization. There was a significant reduction of COACH Risk Engine accuracy (AUC: 0.572; P = 0.011) and a non-significant accuracy reduction of BCN Bio-HF Calculator (AUC: 0.536; P = 0.1) when applied to the protocol-based follow-up programme group. All scores showed good accuracy to predict 1 year mortality (AUC: 0.863, 0.87, 0.818, and 0.82, respectively) when applied to the control group. However, when applied to the protocol-based follow-up programme group, a significant predictive accuracy reduction of COACH Risk Engine, BCN Bio-HF Calculator, and MAGGIC Risk Calculator (AUC: 0.366, 0.642, and 0.277, P < 0.001, 0.002, and <0.001, respectively) was observed. Seattle Heart Failure Model had non-significant reduction in its acuity (AUC: 0.597; P = 0.24). Conclusions: The accuracy of the aforementioned scores to predict major events in patients with heart failure is significantly reduced when they are applied to patients included in a multidisciplinary heart failure management programme.
- Effectiveness and safety of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with chronic kidney disease: a real-world experiencePublication . Couto Pereira, Sara Cristina; Rodrigues, Tiago; Ferreira, Afonso Nunes; Agostinho, João R.; Pinto, Fausto J.; Brito, DulceBackground: data regarding the effectiveness and safety of sacubitril/valsartan in heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are scarse. Objective: to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of sacubitril/valsartan in HFrEF and CKD in a real-world population. Methods: we included consecutive ambulatory HFrEF patients that initiated sacubitril/valsartan between February 2017 and October 2020, stratified by CKD (KDIGO stage 5 excluded). Primary outcomes: the incidence rate per 100 patient-years and the annualized length of stay (LOS) of acute decompensated HF hospitalizations (HFH). Secondary outcomes: all-cause mortality, NYHA improvement, and titration of sacubitril/valsartan. Results: We included 179 patients, 77 with CKD, those being older (72 ± 10 vs. 65 ± 12 years, p < 0.001), had higher NT-proBNP (4623 ± 5266 vs. 1901 ± 1835 pg/mL, p < 0.001), and high anaemia incidence (p < 0.001). After 19 ± 11 months, a significant reduction in HFH adjusted incidence rate (57.5% decrease in CKD vs. 74.6%, p = 0.261) was observed, with 5 days there was a reduction in annualized LOS in both groups (p = 0.319). NYHA improved similarly in both groups (p = 0.670). CKD patients presented non-significant higher all-cause mortality (HR = 2.405, 95%CI: [0.841; 6.879], p = 0.102). Both groups had similar sacubitril/valsartan maximum dose achievement and drug withdrawal. Conclusion: sacubitril/valsartan was effective on reducing HFH and LOS without affecting all-cause mortality in a CKD real-world population.
- Infective endocarditis risk in patients with bicuspid aortic valve: systematic review and meta-analysisPublication . Couto Pereira, Sara Cristina; Abrantes, Ana; António, Pedro Silverio; Morais, Pedro; Santos De Sousa, Catarina Isabel; David, Cláudio; Pinto, Fausto J.; Almeida, Ana G.; Caldeira, DanielBackground: Antibiotic prophylaxis in bicuspid aortic valve patients is currently a matter of debate. Although it is no longer recommended by international guidelines, some studies indicate a high risk of infective endocarditis. We aim to evaluate the risk of native valve infective endocarditis in bicuspid aortic valve patients and compare to individuals with tricuspid aortic valve. Methods: Study search of longitudinal studies regarding infective endocarditis incidence in bicuspid aortic valve patients (compared with tricuspid aortic valve/overall population) was conducted through OVID in the following electronic databases: MEDLINE, CENTRAL, EMBASE; from inception until October 2020. The outcomes of interest were the incidence rate and relative risk of infective endocarditis. The relative risk and incidence rate (number of cases for each 10 000 persons-year) with their 95 % confidence intervals (95 %CI) were estimated using a random effects model meta-analysis. The study protocol was registered at PROSPERO CRD42020218639. Results: Eight cohort studies were selected, with a total of 5351 bicuspid aortic valve patients. During follow up, 184 bicuspid aortic valve patients presented infective endocarditis, with an incidence rate of 48.13 per 10,000 patients-year (95 %CI 22.24-74.02), and a 12-fold (RR: 12.03, 95 %CI 5.45-26.54) increased risk compared with general population, after adjusted estimates. Conclusions: This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that bicuspid aortic valve patients have a significant high risk of native valve infective endocarditis. Large prospective high-quality studies are required to estimate more accurately the incidence of infective endocarditis, the relative risk and the potential benefit of antibiotic prophylaxis.
- Are we aiming for different metabolic targets in heart failure patients?Publication . Brito, J.; Agostinho, João R.; Duarte, C.; Silva, B.; Couto Pereira, Sara Cristina; Morais, Pedro; Cunha, Nelson; Rodrigues, Tiago; Antonio, P. S.; Santos, R.; Nunes-Ferreira, Afonso; Rigueira, Joana; Aguiar-Ricardo, Inês; Pinto, Fausto J.; Brito, DulceIntroduction: Metabolic control plays an important role on major cardiovascular events (MACE) prevention. The 2019 ESC guidelines on dyslipidaemia management recommend tighter LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) control in order to prevent cardiovascular events. However, it is not yet proven that thigh control of dyslipidaemia, glycaemic levels and body mass index (BMI) in Heart Failure (HF) patients (pts) have an impact on prognosis. Objective: To evaluate the impact of LDL-C, HbA1c and BMI values on HF pts mortality and MACE rates.
- Home-based cardiac rehabilitation during COVID-19 pandemic: effectiveness of an educational interventionPublication . Silva, B. V.; Aguiar-Ricardo, Inês; Alves Da Silva, P.; Rodrigues, Tiago; Cunha, Nelson; Couto Pereira, Sara Cristina; Silverio Antonio, P.; Brito, J.; Pinto, R.; Pires, Madalena; Fiuza, S.; Correia, A. L.; Pinto, Fausto J.; Abreu, AnaPatient education is considered a core component of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) and nowadays, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic, online education programs are critical. However, the best strategy for implementing these digital programs to increase patients’ adherence and learning is not fully established.
- Non‐invasive telemonitoring improves outcomes in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction : a study in high‐risk patientsPublication . Nunes-Ferreira, Afonso; Agostinho, João R.; Rigueira, Joana; Aguiar-Ricardo, Inês; Guimarães, Tatiana; Santos, Rafael; Rodrigues, Tiago; Cunha, Nelson; António, Pedro Silvério; Couto Pereira, Sara Cristina; Morais, Pedro; Mendes Pedro, Mónica; Veiga, Fátima; Pinto, Fausto J.; Brito, DulceAims: Non-invasive telemonitoring (TM) in patients with heart failure (HF) and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF) may be useful in the early diagnosis of HF decompensation, allowing therapeutic optimization and avoiding re-hospitalization. We describe a TM programme in this population and evaluate its effectiveness during a 12 month period. Methods and results: We conducted a single-centre study of patients discharged from hospital after decompensated HF, allocated into three groups: prospective TM programme, prospective HF protocol follow-up programme (PFP) with no TM facilities, and retrospective propensity-matched usual care (UC). TM effectiveness was assessed by all-cause hospitalizations and mortality; HF-related hospitalization (HFH), days lost to unplanned hospital admissions/death, functional capacity and quality of life (New York Heart Association, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire, 6 min walk test, and plasma N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide) were also evaluated. A total of 125 patients were included [65.9 ± 11.9 years, 32% female, left ventricular ejection fraction 27% (21-32)]. TM was similar to PFP regarding effectiveness; TM reduced all-cause hospitalization and mortality (HR 0.27; 95% CI 0.11-0.71; P < 0.01) and HFH (HR 0.29; 95% CI 0.10-0.89; P < 0.05) as compared with UC. TM reduced the average number of days lost due to unplanned hospital admissions or all-cause death as compared with PFP (5.6 vs. 12.4 days, P < 0.05) and UC (5.6 vs. 48.8 days, P < 0.01). Impact on quality of life was similar between TM and PFP (P = 0.36). Conclusions: In patients with HFrEF and recent HF hospitalization, non-invasive TM reduced 12 month all-cause hospitalization/mortality and HFH as compared with usual care. TM also reduced the number of days lost due to unplanned hospital admission/death as compared with either an optimized protocol-based follow-up programme or usual care.