FM - Conferências
URI permanente para esta coleção:
Navegar
Entradas recentes
- Scholarly publishing and peer-review in times of crisis: an overviewPublication . Henriques, Susana Oliveira; Waltman, Ludo; Pinfield, Stephen; Rzayeva, NarminWe present the main conclusions, lessons learned, and recommendations of the work carried out in the COVID-19 Rapid Review Initiative, published in a detailed report (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare. 17125394.v1), prepared by the Research-on-Research Institute (RoRI, http://researchonresearch.org/) in collaboration with researchers, publishers, and other scholarly communication experts.
- The PREPIT project : Pregraduate Research Program Impact & Trajectories : a work in progressPublication . Henriques, Susana Oliveira; Barrosa, Sónia; Fernandes, Ricardo M.Introduction: The GAPIC – Gabinete de Apoio à Investigação Científica, Tecnológica e Inovação (Scientific Research, Technology and Innovation Support Office) of Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa (FMUL) is celebrating its 30th anniversary. During the past 30 years, GAPIC has developed several initiatives to promote and disseminate scientific research, mostly among undergraduate students and young graduates. These initiatives have been fundamental in the career path of young students and have had an increase impact in the future of society and the quality of life of its citizens. To assess the impact of GAPIC Programs in terms of gains in knowledge, skills and attitudes; barriers and opportunities; scientific production and professional trajectories of undergraduate students who participated in the GAPIC scientific research projects from 1997/98 to 2014/2015, the PREPIT Project is being developed with the collaboration of the FMUL´s library team. Two primary objectives were defined: i) Evaluate scientific productivity indicators of participants in GAPIC undergraduate programs in short and long term (study A); ii) Characterize the perspectives of participants in GAPIC undergraduate programs on the importance and impact of these (study B). Secondary objectives are: i) Identify predictors of scientific productivity indicators of these participants in short and long term (study A); ii) Characterize professional and academic trajectories among participants and identify predictors of these trajectories (study B). As a work in progress, only preliminary results are presented. Methods: Study Design1: two-component observational study: cohort, retrospective, bibliometric (study A) and cross-sectional, by electronic survey (study B). Population: all undergraduate students accepted to the GAPIC “Education for Science” program (or equivalent) from 1997/98 to 2014/2015. Data Collection and Instruments: i) data collection for the bibliometric cohort study (study A): academic year/GAPIC program; number of participations; demographic data; project description; ORCID iD. The definition of scientific profiles will be done through WoS and Scopus bibliometric data. Data will be exported to Excel and analyzed through SPSS. For data collection by electronic survey (study B) SurveyMonkey platform will be used. The survey will include closed, single and multiple choice questions, with Likert2 items. A modified Dillmman methodology3 with 3 reminders will be used and the survey will be open for 4 weeks. Study B protocol will be submitted to the Ethics Committee. Results and discussion: Based on author name and ORCID iD search, by now we have collected preliminary bibliometric data from 553 students involved in 387 GAPIC projects. As this is a work in progress more results will be available soon after the distribution and analysis of the electronic survey results. At the end of the project we aim to achieve all the proposed objectives, to gain an in-depth understanding of the impact and relevance of integrating research in all stages of medical education and positively contribute to support future research training interventions.
- Scientific publication management and assessment at Lisbon University School of Medicine (FMUL) : a multidisciplinary approachPublication . Henriques, Susana Oliveira; Barrosa, SóniaIntroduction In 2017, Lisbon University (ULisboa) started to consider scientific publication outputs as a criterion for budgetary allocation of schools. Only articles correctly affiliated and published in WoS or Scopus indexed journals were considered. With FMUL’s 2014–2017 Scientific Publication Report, some gaps were identified: wrong affiliation, authorship ambiguity, publication in not indexed journals (including predatory ones) and low adherence to the Institutional Repository. Thus the need of a Scientific Publication Policy for FMUL was highlighted. To support the future definition of a FMUL’s Scientific Publication Policy, a multidisciplinary team began to work with two main objectives: develop a Study Plan and Strategic Intervention about FMUL’s Scientific Publication and implement a Scientific Information Management System. Together with the Strategic and Quality Planning Office the Library coordinates the project. Librarians, quality management specialists, professors and researchers are working together as key partners. When necessary, specialized external consulting is requested. This project is part of the FMUL’s Internal Quality Assurance System1 (SIGQ-FMUL) and it’s one of the major priorities of the Improvement Action Plan, based on the PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) methodology. Methods In 2017 we were focused on preparing a better response to the requirements of ULisboa, and minimize the negative impact in the budget allocation. To ensure that affiliation rules were met, the FMUL’s Affiliation Policy Guide2 was published based on the ULisboa Author’s Affiliation Rules3;4. Briefing sessions with the research groups about affiliation, authorship, journal selection and repository auto-archive were organized. To measure the impact of this first intervention, in 2018 the evolution of the occurrence of affiliation errors between 2013/2017 was analyzed. To better fulfill researcher’s specific needs the Library IL training program was restructured and a new Teaching and Research Support Unit was implemented. A protocol was established with FCT – the Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology, for the development of the Institutions Area in the new national CIÊNCIAVITAE platform, which seems to be a good solution as a Scientific Information Management System. Results As this is an ongoing project to develop until de end of 2020, by this moment only preliminary results can be presented. From 2013 to 2018 there was a significant increase in the number of publications in WoS or Scopus indexed journals correctly affiliated: 58,9% in 2013 vs 73% in 2018. From 2017 to 2018, auto-archive in the institutional repository increased 31%. Since 2017 eight new topics were added to the IL training program for researchers support. As we are now working on the 2019 report, more detailed data will be available soon. Discussion Although we question the criteria applied by ULisboa to assess the scientific outputs of schools, it gave us the opportunity to promote a more responsible behavior of our academic community, concerning scientific publication. From the preliminary results, we believe that this multidisciplinary approach is a good strategy to overcome the identified gaps. At the end of 2020, we aim to give a positive contribute for the definition of FMUL’s Scientific Publication Policy and reinforce our role as a transversal support team. More time is needed to conclude the project, evaluate the impact of it and define future directions.
- Repositório institucional e rede social académica: um estudo de caso na área da saúde da Universidade de Lisboa (ULisboa)Publication . Melo, Luiza Baptista; Sanches, Tatiana; Lopes, Sílvia Costa; Henriques, Susana OliveiraO Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Lisboa (Repositório.UL) tem por objetivo reunir, organizar, divulgar e preservar a produção científica das suas escolas e institutos. O ResearchGate (RG) é uma plataforma gratuita para partilha de resultados de investigação, interação e colaboração internacional de docentes/investigadores. No entanto, a sua utilização levanta dúvidas quanto ao formato adequado para depósito, infrações de direitos de autor ou incumprimento de políticas de depósito (Jamali, 2017). Num estudo comparativo sobre os repositórios de 13 universidades espanholas e a plataforma RG, Borrego (2017) conclui que, tendencialmente, os investigadores estão sub-representados nos repositórios institucionais. Estudos sobre a utilização do RG pela comunidade científica (Dafonte-Gómez, Míguez-González, & Puentes-Rivera, 2015; Ribeiro, Oliveira & Furtado, 2017; Liu & Fang, 2018) destacam a sua mais-valia no reconhecimento e visibilidade de docentes/investigadores e no alargamento do processo de comunicação entre pares, com vantagens na disseminação dos resultados e na criação de redes de investigação. Neste estudo, cujo alvo são as Faculdades de Farmácia (FF), Medicina (FM), Medicina Dentária (FMD) e Psicologia (FP), as autoras procuram identificar as tendências quanto à adesão a estas plataformas por parte dos docentes/investigadores das escolas em análise.
- Balanced Scorecard e CAF: as experiências da FFUL e da FMULPublication . Lopes, Sílvia Costa; Clamote, Emília Calado; Henriques, SusanaA procura da Qualidade nas organizações, em todas as etapas do processo produtivo e em todos os níveis hierárquicos, é uma preocupação que tem assumido particular relevo, orientando para melhoria de conceitos, hábitos e procedimentos e colocando particular ênfase na valorização do ser humano no processo de crescimento e desenvolvimento das organizações. Existem diversas ferramentas e metodologias que ajudam as organizações a atingir a excelência e a qualidade. Apresentam-se as experiências da Faculdade de Farmácia da UL (FFUL) na aplicação do Balanced Scorecard (sistema de gestão e planeamento estratégico) aos serviços da Biblioteca/SDI e da Faculdade de Medicina da UL (FMUL) na aplicação da Estrutura Comum de Avaliação (Common Assessment Framework - CAF), aos serviços técnico-administrativos, com especial enfoque na Biblioteca-CDI
- Fulfilling the needs of our users in the Lisbon Faculty of Medicine LibraryPublication . Henriques, Susana, 1974-This work aims to reassert the value of libraries and librarians in a time where value is given essentially to technological factors that in the last few years brought major changes to our work environment.
- Measure and plan to improve communication: Balanced Scorecard implementation study in the Faculty of Medicine Library, University of Lisbon, PortugalPublication . Clamote, Emília Calado, 1952-; Henriques, Susana, 1974-This poster aims to share the experience of Balanced Scorecard implementation study in the Lisbon Faculty of Medicine Library. Balanced Scorecard help Libraries and Librarians to deal with this challenge of implementing and communicate their strategies as a conceptual framework for translating its mission and objectives into a set of performance indicators distributed among their four balanced perspectives of strategic priorities.