Integrity and misconduct, where does artificial intelligence lead?

This paper, part of the third stage of the Harbingers project studying early career researchers (ECRs), focuses on the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on scholarly communications. It concentrates on research integrity and misconduct, a ‘hot’ topic among the publishing community, in no small part due to the rise of AI. The interview-based study, supported by an extensive literature review, covers a convenience sample of 91 ECRs from all disciplines and half a dozen countries. It provides a new and fresh take on the subject, using the ‘voices’ of ECRs to describe their views and practices regarding integrity and misconduct. We show that ECRs are clearly aware of research misconduct and questionable practice with three-quarters saying so. A big indictment of the scholarly system, but, not surprising given a rising number of retractions and questionable journals. The main blame for this is levelled at the haste with which researchers publish and the volume of papers produced. ECRs also feel that things are likely to get worse with the advent of AI. They believe that they are aware of the problems and how to avoid the pitfalls but suspect that things are approaching a cliff-edge, which can only be avoided with strong policies and an overhaul of the reputational system.

Keywords

Artificial intelligence

URI

http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/102082

Citation

Nicholas, D., Herman, E., Clark, D., Abrizah, A., Revez, J., Rodríguez‐Bravo, B., Świgoń, M., Xu, J., & Watkinson, A. (2025). Integrity and Misconduct, Where Does Artificial Intelligence Lead? Learned Publishing, 38(3), e2013. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.2013