A carregar...
Publicação
Trauma complexo e interpessoal na relação com a psicopatologia
| Nome: | Descrição: | Tamanho: | Formato: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 450.84 KB | Adobe PDF |
Autores
Orientador(es)
Resumo(s)
Esta dissertação do domínio da Psicologia Clínica estuda o trauma complexo e
interpessoal na relação com a psicopatologia. Esta investigação têm quatro objetivos
principais: (1) fazer uma comparação entre os resultados do trauma complexo num
Grupo com Evidências de Trauma Interpessoal (GCTI) e, o seu grupo de controlo,
Grupo Sem Evidências de Trauma Interpessoal (GSTI); (2) fazer uma comparação entre
os resultados de sintomatologia psicopatológica no GCTI e o GSTI; (3) fazer uma
análise das relações entre as diferentes dimensões do trauma complexo e as diferentes
escalas e índices de sintomatologia psicopatológica; (4) fazer uma predição das
dimensões do trauma complexo consoante as escalas e índices de sintomatologia
psicopatológica. As amostras são constituídas por dois grupos: o grupo experimental,
GCTI, constituído por 25 participantes da população geral e o seu grupo de controlo,
GSTI, constituído por 38 participantes da população geral. Foram utilizados três
questionários de autorrelato: o Life Event Checklist for DSM-5 (LEC-5), o Self- Report
Inventory of Disorders of Extreme Stress (SIDES-SR) e o Brief Symptom Inventory
(BSI). Nos resultados observa-se uma média superior no GCTI na dimensão
‘somatização’ do trauma complexo do SIDES-SR na comparação com o GSTI. O GCTI
apresentou médias superiores nas escalas e índices do BSI ‘somatização’, ‘sensibilidade
interpessoal’, ‘ansiedade’, ‘ansiedade fóbica’, ‘IGS’ e ‘TSP’ do BSI na comparação
com o GSTI. O estudo ainda revelou que existem relações positivas entre as dimensões
do trauma complexo do SIDES-SR e o ‘IGS’ do BSI, excetuando a dimensão
‘somatização’ no GCTI. Nos modelos de regressão encontraram-se escalas de
sintomatologia psicopatológica que são preditoras das dimensões do trauma complexo,
e.g. a escala ‘ideação paranoide’ do BSI que é preditora de quatro dimensões diferentes
do SIDES-SR no GCTI. Esta investigação permitiu compreender o impacto que as
experiências de trauma interpessoal podem ter no funcionamento psicológico,
nomeadamente ao nível do desenvolvimento do trauma complexo e de psicopatologia.
Sugere-se para futuros estudos, investigar a influência de diferentes tipos de trauma
interpessoal e compreender o papel da idade como mediador para o seu
desenvolvimento.
This dissertation from the Clinical Psychology field studies complex and interpersonal trauma in its relation to psychopathology. This investigation has four main aims: (1) to make a comparison between the results of complex trauma in a Group with Evidences of Interpersonal Trauma (GCTI) and its control group, Group without Evidences of Interpersonal Trauma (GSTI), (2) to make a comparison between the results of psychopathological symptoms in GCTI and GSTI, (3) to make an analysis of the relations between the different dimensions of complex trauma and the different scales and indices of psychopathological symptoms, and (4) to predict the dimensions of Complex Trauma using the scales and indices of psychopathological symptoms. Two groups constitute the samples: the experimental group, GCTI, with 25 participants from the general population, and its control group, GSTI, with 38 participants from the general population. For this investigation three self-report questionnaires were used: the Life Event Checklist for DSM-5 (LEC-5), the Self- Report Inventory of Disorders of Extreme Stress (SIDES-SR) and the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI). The results only revealed one significant difference between the means of the dimensions of Complex Trauma in SIDES-SR for GCTI and GSTI, which was for the ‘somatization’ dimension, superior in GCTI. GCTI presented superior results in comparison to GSTI in the ‘somatization’, ‘interpersonal sensibility’, ‘anxiety’ and ‘phobic anxiety’ scales of BSI in comparison to GSTI. This study also demonstrated that positive correlations exist for GCTI between the dimensions of complex trauma in SIDES-SR and the ‘IGS’ in BSI, except for the ‘somatization’ dimension. At last, it was found that several psychopathological symptoms predict compromised dimensions in complex trauma, such as for example, the ‘paranoid ideation’ scale in BSI predicts compromised functioning in four different dimensions of SIDES-SR in GCTI. This investigation demonstrated the impact that experiences of interpersonal trauma can have in the functioning of a person, promoting a development of symptoms associated to complex trauma and psychopathology. In future studies, it is suggested that there is a more in depth study on how different types of interpersonal trauma can influence these symptoms, as well as understand how age can act as a mediator for their development.
This dissertation from the Clinical Psychology field studies complex and interpersonal trauma in its relation to psychopathology. This investigation has four main aims: (1) to make a comparison between the results of complex trauma in a Group with Evidences of Interpersonal Trauma (GCTI) and its control group, Group without Evidences of Interpersonal Trauma (GSTI), (2) to make a comparison between the results of psychopathological symptoms in GCTI and GSTI, (3) to make an analysis of the relations between the different dimensions of complex trauma and the different scales and indices of psychopathological symptoms, and (4) to predict the dimensions of Complex Trauma using the scales and indices of psychopathological symptoms. Two groups constitute the samples: the experimental group, GCTI, with 25 participants from the general population, and its control group, GSTI, with 38 participants from the general population. For this investigation three self-report questionnaires were used: the Life Event Checklist for DSM-5 (LEC-5), the Self- Report Inventory of Disorders of Extreme Stress (SIDES-SR) and the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI). The results only revealed one significant difference between the means of the dimensions of Complex Trauma in SIDES-SR for GCTI and GSTI, which was for the ‘somatization’ dimension, superior in GCTI. GCTI presented superior results in comparison to GSTI in the ‘somatization’, ‘interpersonal sensibility’, ‘anxiety’ and ‘phobic anxiety’ scales of BSI in comparison to GSTI. This study also demonstrated that positive correlations exist for GCTI between the dimensions of complex trauma in SIDES-SR and the ‘IGS’ in BSI, except for the ‘somatization’ dimension. At last, it was found that several psychopathological symptoms predict compromised dimensions in complex trauma, such as for example, the ‘paranoid ideation’ scale in BSI predicts compromised functioning in four different dimensions of SIDES-SR in GCTI. This investigation demonstrated the impact that experiences of interpersonal trauma can have in the functioning of a person, promoting a development of symptoms associated to complex trauma and psychopathology. In future studies, it is suggested that there is a more in depth study on how different types of interpersonal trauma can influence these symptoms, as well as understand how age can act as a mediator for their development.
Descrição
Tese de mestrado, Psicologia (Área de Especialização em Psicologia Clínica e da Saúde - Psicologia Clínica Dinâmica), Universidade de Lisboa, Faculdade de Psicologia, 2020
Palavras-chave
Trauma Psicopatologia Psicologia clínica Teses de mestrado - 2020