Loading...
Publication
Conceito de esbulho
| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 799.75 KB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
O presente estudo visa chegar ao conceito de esbulho, na medida em que existe falta de consenso na qualificação dos factos como perturbação e/ou esbulho. Isto é, relativamente aos casos da vida corrente, ocorre alguma discordância, entre a doutrina, no momento de qualificar os factos. Tal circunstância parece resultar da abstração e da dificuldade de entender o conceito fornecido, que muitas vezes se torna de difícil aplicação.
Assim, de forma a superar as dificuldades encontradas na aplicação do conceito fornecido pela doutrina, será importante a revisão do conceito de esbulho, anteriormente fornecido e, consequentemente, a criação de um conceito mais idóneo e mais ajustado à realidade, de forma a extinguir a discrepância no momento da aplicação do conceito de esbulho aos factos.
No presente trabalho, procedeu-se à análise de alguns autores, de forma a chegar ao conceito de esbulho e, assim, indagar acerca do percurso de raciocínio realizado por estes. Considerando esta análise, existem maioritariamente duas posições: por um lado, a privação da posse ou do seu exercício, como a perda da posse e, por outro, a privação da coisa. Contudo, alguns autores pronunciam-se sobre o esbulho como a perda da posse efetiva.
Posto isto, foi feita ainda a análise do ordenamento jurídico, incluindo os seus princípios, seguido do cruzamento entre este e as posições preconizadas pelos autores observados, de forma a captar a idoneidade das suas correntes doutrinárias. Após toda a observação e indagação, foi construído um novo percurso conceptual de acordo com uma nova linha de raciocínio. Assim, temos esbulho como a quebra do corpus possessório, proveniente de uma posse incompatível.
The present study aims to arrive at the concept of dispossession, to the extent that there is a lack of consensus in the qualification of the facts as disturbance and / or dispos-session. That is, in the cases of life, there is some disagreement between the doctrine when it comes to qualifying the facts. This circumstance seems to result from the abstrac-tion and the difficulty in making sense of the concept provided, which often becomes diffi-cult to apply. Thus, in order to overcome the difficulties found in the application of the concept provided by the doctrine, it is important to review the concept of dispossession, previously provided and, consequently, the creation of a more suitable and adjusted to reality con-cept, in order to extinguish the discrepancy when applying the concept of dispossession to the facts. In the present work, an analysis of some authors was carried out, in order to arrive at the concept of dispossession and, thus, to investigate the reasoning path carried out by them. So there are mostly two positions, these are the deprivation of possession or its ex-ercise, like the loss of possession and, on the other hand, the deprivation of the thing. However, some authors pronounce themselves on the dispossession as the loss of effec-tive possession. That said, the legal system and its principles were also observed, followed by the alignment between this and the line of reasoning of the authors observed, in order to cap-ture its suitability. After all the observation and questioning, a new route was built accord-ing to a new line of reasoning. From which it results, such as the breaking of the possesso-ry corpus, resulting from an incompatible possession.
The present study aims to arrive at the concept of dispossession, to the extent that there is a lack of consensus in the qualification of the facts as disturbance and / or dispos-session. That is, in the cases of life, there is some disagreement between the doctrine when it comes to qualifying the facts. This circumstance seems to result from the abstrac-tion and the difficulty in making sense of the concept provided, which often becomes diffi-cult to apply. Thus, in order to overcome the difficulties found in the application of the concept provided by the doctrine, it is important to review the concept of dispossession, previously provided and, consequently, the creation of a more suitable and adjusted to reality con-cept, in order to extinguish the discrepancy when applying the concept of dispossession to the facts. In the present work, an analysis of some authors was carried out, in order to arrive at the concept of dispossession and, thus, to investigate the reasoning path carried out by them. So there are mostly two positions, these are the deprivation of possession or its ex-ercise, like the loss of possession and, on the other hand, the deprivation of the thing. However, some authors pronounce themselves on the dispossession as the loss of effec-tive possession. That said, the legal system and its principles were also observed, followed by the alignment between this and the line of reasoning of the authors observed, in order to cap-ture its suitability. After all the observation and questioning, a new route was built accord-ing to a new line of reasoning. From which it results, such as the breaking of the possesso-ry corpus, resulting from an incompatible possession.
Description
Keywords
Direitos reais Posse Esbulho Corpus possessório Teses de mestrado - 2021