| Nome: | Descrição: | Tamanho: | Formato: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 463.3 KB | Adobe PDF |
Autores
Orientador(es)
Resumo(s)
In this paper we discuss two types of co-occurrence restrictions involving reflexive clitics in European Portuguese and examine their implications for obligatory control. We argue that these restrictions may shed some light on where the “controller” is generated, thus making it possible to empirically test three minimalist approaches to control: the predicate attraction approach (see Manzini and Roussou 2000), the PRO-based approach (e.g. Chomsky and Lasnik 1993, Landau 2000, 2004, and Martin 2001), and the movement approach (e.g. Hornstein 1999, 2001 and Boeckx, Hornstein, and Nunes 2010). We show that neither of the approaches is able to capture all the relevant data if pursued under a strong lexicalist perspective such as Chomsky’s (1993, 2000) and that only the movement approach can account for all the data in a uniform way under Chomsky’s (2001) weak lexicalist perspective.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Control theory Identity avoidance Phase Impenetrability Condition Reflexive clitics Indefinite se European Portuguese
Contexto Educativo
Citação
Martins, Ana Maria & Jairo Nunes (2017). Identity Avoidance with Reflexive Clitics in European Portuguese and Minimalist Approaches to Control. Linguistic Inquiry 48.4: 627-649. https://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/full/10.1162/LING_a_00256
Editora
The MIT Press
