| Nome: | Descrição: | Tamanho: | Formato: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 567.91 KB | Adobe PDF |
Orientador(es)
Resumo(s)
Esta dissertação insere-se no âmbito da Psicologia Clínica e pretende analisar as
relações entre a dimensão depressiva da personalidade, a sintomatologia psicopatológica e a
satisfação relacional, na população geral adulta. Foram criados dois grupos que discriminam
a perceção dos participante em termos da sua satisfação relacional: um grupo de sujeitos com
relações de qualidade “Muito Satisfatória” (M = 37.71 anos, DP = 12.72 anos) e um grupo de
sujeitos com relações de qualidade “Medianamente, Pouco ou Nada Satisfatória” (M = 42.74
anos, DP = 13.71 anos). Os objetivos deste estudo consistem em: (1) Analisar as relações
entre a dimensão depressiva da personalidade e o mal-estar psicológico; (2) Comparar as
diferenças na média de valores nas dimensões depressivas e nas dimensões da sintomatologia
psicopatológica, entre os grupos de satisfação relacional; (3) Analisar as relações entre as
dimensões depressivas e as dimensões da sintomatologia, para cada grupo de satisfação
relacional; (4) Explorar que dimensões da sintomatologia psicopatológica predizem as
dimensões depressivas, para cada grupo de satisfação relacional. Foram administrados dois
instrumentos: o Inventário de Traços Depressivos (ITD-R) e o Inventário de Sintomas
Psicopatológicos (BSI). As dimensões depressivas correlacionaram-se significativamente
com o mal-estar psicológico. O grupo com relações de qualidade “Medianamente, Pouco ou
Nada Satisfatória” apresentou resultados mais elevados para as dimensões depressivas e para
as dimensões da sintomatologia psicopatológica, em comparação com o grupo com relações
de qualidade “Muito Satisfatória”. O grupo com relações de qualidade “Muito Satisfatória”
apresentou correlações globalmente mais elevadas entre as dimensões depressivas e os
sintomas psicopatológicos, que o segundo grupo. No grupo com relações de qualidade
“Medianamente, Pouco ou Nada Satisfatória”, os sintomas depressivos predizem todas as
dimensões depressivas; a Sensibilidade Interpessoal prediz a Depressão Relacional. No grupo
com relações de qualidade “Muito Satisfatória” os sintomas depressivos predizem a
Depressão Essencial e Inibida; a Sensibilidade Interpessoal prediz a Depressão Relacional, de
Fracasso e Perfecionista; as Obsessões-Compulsões predizem a Depressão de Fracasso; a
Ansiedade prediz a Depressão Perfecionista. Discutem-se implicações teóricas e clínicas que
advém do estudo da relação entre a dimensão depressiva da personalidade, a sintomatologia
psicopatológica e a satisfação relacional.
This dissertation is part of a research project about Clinical Psychology and its aim is to explore the relationship between the depressive personality dimension, psychopathological symptoms and relationship satisfaction, in the general adult population. Two groups were created distinguishing the perception of relationship satisfation of the participants: a group of subjects who qualify their relationships as “Very Satisfying” (age: M = 37.71, DP = 12.72), and a group of subjects who qualify their relationships as “Moderately, Little or Not Satisfying” (age: M = 42.74, DP = 13.71). The specific aims of the study are to: (1) Analyse the relationship between the depressive dimensions and psychological distress; (2) Compare the differences between the groups the mean values on depressive dimensions and psychopathological symptom dimensions; (3) Analyse the relationships between depressive dimensions and psychopathological symptoms dimensions, for each group of relationship satisfaction; (4) Explore which symptom dimensions predict the depressive dimensions, for each group of relationship satisfaction. Two self-report instruments were applied: The Depressive Traits Inventory (DTI) and the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI). The depressive dimensions were significantly correlated with psychological distress. The group of subjects who qualified their relationships as “Moderately, Little or Not Satisfying” presented higher levels on the depressive dimensions and symptom dimensions, comparing with the group who qualified their relationship as “Very Satisfying”. The group with “Very Satisfying” relationships exhibited higher correlations between the depressive dimensions and symptom dimensions, than the other group. In the group that qualified their relationships as “Moderately, Little or Not Satisfying”, the depressive symptoms predicted all the depressive dimensions, and Interpersonal Sensitivity predicted Relational Depression. In the group with “Very Satisfying” relationships, the depressive symptoms predicted both Essencial and Inhibited Depression; Interpersonal Sensitivity predicted Relational, Failure and Perfectionist Depression; Obsessions-Compulsions predicted Failure Depression; Anxiety predicted Perfectionist Depression. Theoretical and clinical implications to the understanding of the relationship between Depressive Personality Dimension, Psychopathological Symptoms and Relationship Satisfaction are discussed.
This dissertation is part of a research project about Clinical Psychology and its aim is to explore the relationship between the depressive personality dimension, psychopathological symptoms and relationship satisfaction, in the general adult population. Two groups were created distinguishing the perception of relationship satisfation of the participants: a group of subjects who qualify their relationships as “Very Satisfying” (age: M = 37.71, DP = 12.72), and a group of subjects who qualify their relationships as “Moderately, Little or Not Satisfying” (age: M = 42.74, DP = 13.71). The specific aims of the study are to: (1) Analyse the relationship between the depressive dimensions and psychological distress; (2) Compare the differences between the groups the mean values on depressive dimensions and psychopathological symptom dimensions; (3) Analyse the relationships between depressive dimensions and psychopathological symptoms dimensions, for each group of relationship satisfaction; (4) Explore which symptom dimensions predict the depressive dimensions, for each group of relationship satisfaction. Two self-report instruments were applied: The Depressive Traits Inventory (DTI) and the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI). The depressive dimensions were significantly correlated with psychological distress. The group of subjects who qualified their relationships as “Moderately, Little or Not Satisfying” presented higher levels on the depressive dimensions and symptom dimensions, comparing with the group who qualified their relationship as “Very Satisfying”. The group with “Very Satisfying” relationships exhibited higher correlations between the depressive dimensions and symptom dimensions, than the other group. In the group that qualified their relationships as “Moderately, Little or Not Satisfying”, the depressive symptoms predicted all the depressive dimensions, and Interpersonal Sensitivity predicted Relational Depression. In the group with “Very Satisfying” relationships, the depressive symptoms predicted both Essencial and Inhibited Depression; Interpersonal Sensitivity predicted Relational, Failure and Perfectionist Depression; Obsessions-Compulsions predicted Failure Depression; Anxiety predicted Perfectionist Depression. Theoretical and clinical implications to the understanding of the relationship between Depressive Personality Dimension, Psychopathological Symptoms and Relationship Satisfaction are discussed.
Descrição
Dissertação de Mestrado, Psicologia (Área de Especialização em Psicologia Clínica e da Saúde - Psicologia Clínica Dinâmica), Universidade de Lisboa, Faculdade de Psicologia, 2020
Palavras-chave
Sintomas depressivos Psicopatologia Mal-estar Satisfação relacional Teses de mestrado - 2020
