A carregar...
Publicação
Adaptação do questionário relação de supervisão (versão reduzida) - versão supervisando
| Nome: | Descrição: | Tamanho: | Formato: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.42 MB | Adobe PDF |
Autores
Orientador(es)
Resumo(s)
O objectivo principal desta investigação foi a adaptação para a população
portuguesa do primeiro questionário sobre a relação de supervisão- Questionário da
Relação de Supervisão (versão reduzida) - versão supervisando. A inexistência de
medidas desta natureza nacionalmente e a importância deste constructo na satisfação
com a supervisão, no desenvolvimento do terapeuta e na eficácia terapêutica motivaram
esta investigação. Realizou-se uma tradução do questionário, seguida de retroversão e
de um pré-teste a um pequeno grupo de estudantes de Psicologia, em supervisão.
Posteriormente procedeu-se com a investigação recrutando-se 90 psicólogos clínicos/
psicoterapeutas em supervisão. Foram recolhidas informações sobre os anos de
experiência, as orientações teóricas e o setting, entre outras. Aplicou-se também o
Questionário Revisto de Personalidade de Eysenck (adaptação Almiro, & Simões, 2013)
para efeitos de validade divergente e o CASES (adaptação Lamares & Conceição, 2012)
para efeitos de validade preditiva. A partir da análise factorial confirmatória fez-se um
pequeno ajustamento. A medida é composta por 17 itens divididos pelas mesmas três
subescalas da medida original e apresenta propriedades psicométricas adequadas
(consistência interna, validade factorial e validade divergente). Um segundo objectivo
desta investigação foi explorar a relação entre algumas das variáveis recolhidas. Os
resultados sugerem que não existem relações significativas entre a relação de supervisão
e a percepção de auto-eficácia, nem diferenças significativas relativamente à qualidade
da relação de supervisão entre clínicos com diferentes anos de experiência ou com
diferentes orientações teóricas ou em diferente setting de supervisão. Discute-se a
utilidade da medida e o seu valor prático bem como aspectos para futuras investigações.
The main objective of this study was the adaptation to the portuguese version of a questionnaire of supervisory relation - Supervision Relation Questionnaire (reduced version) - supervisee version. The lack of national measures on this construct and its importance to the satisfaction with the supervision, development of the trainee and to the effectiveness of supervision motivated this investigation. Was made a translation, a retroversion and an exploratory application to a small group of psychology students in supervision. After, ninety clinical psychologists / psychotherapists in supervision were recruited. Information of years of experience, theoretical orientations and supervision setting were collected. The participants also answered to the Short-scale Eysenck Personality Questionnaire Revised (adaptation Almiro, & Simões, 2013) to ascertain divergent validity and the CASES (adaptation Lamares & Conceição, 2012) to determine the predictive validity. A small adjustment was made, in the confirmatory factorial analysis. The measure is composed by 17 items divided by the same three subscales of the original measure. Adequate psychometric properties (internal consistency, factorial validity and divergent validity) have been demonstrated. A second objective was to explore the relationships between the variables collected. The results suggest that there are no significant relationships between the relationship of supervision and self-efficacy, and also no significant differences regarding the quality of the supervisory’s relationship between clinicians with different years of clinical experience or with different theoretical orientations or different supervisory settings. The utility and practical application of this measure and suggestions for future research are being discussed.
The main objective of this study was the adaptation to the portuguese version of a questionnaire of supervisory relation - Supervision Relation Questionnaire (reduced version) - supervisee version. The lack of national measures on this construct and its importance to the satisfaction with the supervision, development of the trainee and to the effectiveness of supervision motivated this investigation. Was made a translation, a retroversion and an exploratory application to a small group of psychology students in supervision. After, ninety clinical psychologists / psychotherapists in supervision were recruited. Information of years of experience, theoretical orientations and supervision setting were collected. The participants also answered to the Short-scale Eysenck Personality Questionnaire Revised (adaptation Almiro, & Simões, 2013) to ascertain divergent validity and the CASES (adaptation Lamares & Conceição, 2012) to determine the predictive validity. A small adjustment was made, in the confirmatory factorial analysis. The measure is composed by 17 items divided by the same three subscales of the original measure. Adequate psychometric properties (internal consistency, factorial validity and divergent validity) have been demonstrated. A second objective was to explore the relationships between the variables collected. The results suggest that there are no significant relationships between the relationship of supervision and self-efficacy, and also no significant differences regarding the quality of the supervisory’s relationship between clinicians with different years of clinical experience or with different theoretical orientations or different supervisory settings. The utility and practical application of this measure and suggestions for future research are being discussed.
Descrição
Tese de mestrado, Psicologia (Secção de Psicologia Clínica e da Saúde, Núcleo de Psicoterapia Cognitiva-Comportamental e Integrativa), Universidade de Lisboa, Faculdade de Psicologia, 2017
Palavras-chave
Supervisão Questionários Auto-eficácia Teses de mestrado - 2017