| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.07 MB | Adobe PDF | |||
| 711.87 KB | Adobe PDF | |||
| 644.73 KB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
Este trabalho procura refletir sobre o papel da acção popular, nomeadamente sua importância e
utilidade para a efectividade da democracia. Parte-se, principalmente, da teoria desenvolvida
por Thomas Humphrey Marshall, para quem a cidadania pressupõe a conquista de três tipos de
direitos: civis, políticos e sociais. Na sequência, traça-se um panorama histórico da cidadania
no Brasil, de sorte a identificar as confluências e divergências entre a clássica trajetória da
cidadania, desenvolvida a partir da teoria marshalliana, e a história da cidadania na realidade
brasileira, bem como as possíveis causas dessa variação. Ademais, esta pesquisa pretende
analisar o contexto histórico de criação da acção popular no Brasil, e se o conceito de cidadania,
adotado para o manuseio da acção poular, esgota as possibilidade de participação popular na
democracia do país. Por fim, discute-se a acção popular à luz do princípio da separação dos
poderes, de forma a evidenciar a extensão e os limites do Poder Judiciário nessa seara.
Baseando-se no referencial bibliográfico e documental pesquisado, pretende-se explicitar as
razões pelas quais a acção popular, embora prevista formalmente, ainda não representa, na
prática, um efetivo instrumento de efectividade da cidadania no contexto democrático
brasileiro. Como resultado, levanta-se como hipóteses para tal problema: o contexto histórico
de regulamentação da acção popular, a limitação do conceito de cidadania adotado para o uso
da acção popular e a incipiência dos direitos civis, políticos e sociais, nomeadamente
relacionados à participação popular, ao acesso à justiça e à educação.
This work seeks to reflect on the role of popular action, namely its importance and usefulness for the effectiveness of democracy. From the theory developed by Thomas Humphrey Marshall, for whom citizenship presupposes the conquest of three types of rights: civil, political and social. Following, a historical overview of citizenship in Brazil is drawn, in order to identify the confluences and divergences between the trajectory of citizenship in Marshall's work and in the Brazilian reality, as well as the possible causes of this variation. Furthermore, this research intends to analyze the historical context of popular action creation in Brazil, and whether the concept of citizenship, adopted for the handling of popular action, exhausts the possibilities of popular participation in the country's democracy. Finally, popular action is discussed from the principle of separation of powers, in order to highlight the extent and limits of the Judiciary in that area. Based on the researched bibliographic and documentary framework, it is intended to explain the reasons why popular action, although formally foreseen, does not yet represent, in fact, a real instrument of citizenship effectiveness in the Brazilian democratic context. As a result, hypotheses for this problem are raised: the historical context of regulation of popular action, the limitation of citizenship concepts adopted for the use of popular action and the premature nature of civil, political and social rights related to popular participation, access to justice and education.
This work seeks to reflect on the role of popular action, namely its importance and usefulness for the effectiveness of democracy. From the theory developed by Thomas Humphrey Marshall, for whom citizenship presupposes the conquest of three types of rights: civil, political and social. Following, a historical overview of citizenship in Brazil is drawn, in order to identify the confluences and divergences between the trajectory of citizenship in Marshall's work and in the Brazilian reality, as well as the possible causes of this variation. Furthermore, this research intends to analyze the historical context of popular action creation in Brazil, and whether the concept of citizenship, adopted for the handling of popular action, exhausts the possibilities of popular participation in the country's democracy. Finally, popular action is discussed from the principle of separation of powers, in order to highlight the extent and limits of the Judiciary in that area. Based on the researched bibliographic and documentary framework, it is intended to explain the reasons why popular action, although formally foreseen, does not yet represent, in fact, a real instrument of citizenship effectiveness in the Brazilian democratic context. As a result, hypotheses for this problem are raised: the historical context of regulation of popular action, the limitation of citizenship concepts adopted for the use of popular action and the premature nature of civil, political and social rights related to popular participation, access to justice and education.
Description
Dissertação de Mestrado em Ciência Política
Keywords
Acção popular Cidadania Democracia Participação política Popular action Citizenship Democracy Political participation
Pedagogical Context
Citation
Publisher
Instituto Superior de Ciências Sociais e Políticas