| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.04 MB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
Trata-se de estudo de processo civil brasileiro que examina a temática da prova ilícita e apresenta a hipótese de os comportamentos processuais poderem ser tomados como variáveis no aproveitamento da atividade probatória, tendo em mente a possível interação desta atividade com o princípio da aquisição processual.
Como premissas de trabalho, promove-se o desenvolvimento do conceito de prova ilícita em paralelo ao reconhecimento do direito à prova como direito fundamental em sua acepção mais ampla e, como tal, sujeita a renúncias e restrições.
Da mesma forma, ainda como pressuposto, apresenta-se a compreensão de que, no caso brasileiro, há distinção entre regimes afetos ao processo civil e ao processo penal, o que também se evidencia nas regras de inadmissibilidade de provas.
Promovem-se, ainda, o estudo do regime das exclusionary rules norte-americanas e a interação do princípio da aquisição com a temática das provas ilícitas, sempre com vistas a aferir a influência dos comportamentos das partes em juízo como elemento indissociável para o aproveitamento de provas passíveis de questionamento.
Como marco teórico, adota-se, ainda, a leitura constitucional do processo civil, a implicar o modelo cooperativo e o reconhecimento da estatura constitucional da boa-fé. Desenvolvem-se considerações a respeito dos deveres de todos aqueles envolvidos no processo, tanto no que diz respeito à formação de justas expectativas quanto à imposição de sanções contra atitudes disfuncionais.
Como ponto distintivo de estudos relacionados ao tema, busca-se a superação do emprego do princípio da proporcionalidade, particularmente post factum, isto é, pelo resultado probatório com a defesa, ao contrário do emprego de justificativas prévias à adoção do meio de prova, que é um efetivo mecanismo dialógico.
Esta compreensão do processo cooperativo condiciona a releitura proposta ao princípio da aquisição, sendo que o conjunto das observações trazidas pelas partes é submetido a uma série de problematizações apresentadas por meio de amplo levantamento de precedentes e de situações de resolução controvertida como efetivos teste empírico das hipóteses suscitadas.
This thesis studies the Brazilian civil procedure applied to assess unlawful evidence and presents the hypothesis that procedural behaviors can be taken as variables in the exercise of evidentiary presentation before the court under the principle that the evidence belongs to all parties in the proceedings, not only to its presenter (princípio de aquisição processual). The premises of exam are to review the concept of unlawful evidence and acknowledge the right to proof as a fundamental right in its broadest meaning, and, as such, subject to waivers and limits. The thesis also proposes the understanding that in Brazil there is a distinction between regimes related to civil procedure and those related to criminal procedure, which can also be seen in the rules of inadmissibility of evidence. Additionally it studies the US exclusionary rules as well as the interaction of the princípio de aquisição processual with unlawful evidence in order to verify the influence of the parties’ behavior in court as an essential element in the use of evidence that can be challenged. To this theoretical framework, the constitutional reading of the civil process is also adopted, implying the cooperative model and the acknowledgment of good faith’s constitutional stature. Thus, the duties of all those involved in the process are discussed, regarding both the formation of fair expectations and the imposition of sanctions against undesirable behaviors. As a distinguishing related effort, this thesis also seeks to explain the importance of substituing the use of the principle of proportionality, particularly post factum, i.e. based on the evidentiary result with the defense, for use of justifications prior to the adoption of the means of proof, which is an effective dialogic mechanism. This understanding of the cooperative process conditions the proposed revisit to the princípio de aquisição: the set of observations presented by the parties are subject to a series of problematizations based on a broad survey of precedents and situations with controversial resolutions as an effective empirical test for the hypotheses of this thesis.
This thesis studies the Brazilian civil procedure applied to assess unlawful evidence and presents the hypothesis that procedural behaviors can be taken as variables in the exercise of evidentiary presentation before the court under the principle that the evidence belongs to all parties in the proceedings, not only to its presenter (princípio de aquisição processual). The premises of exam are to review the concept of unlawful evidence and acknowledge the right to proof as a fundamental right in its broadest meaning, and, as such, subject to waivers and limits. The thesis also proposes the understanding that in Brazil there is a distinction between regimes related to civil procedure and those related to criminal procedure, which can also be seen in the rules of inadmissibility of evidence. Additionally it studies the US exclusionary rules as well as the interaction of the princípio de aquisição processual with unlawful evidence in order to verify the influence of the parties’ behavior in court as an essential element in the use of evidence that can be challenged. To this theoretical framework, the constitutional reading of the civil process is also adopted, implying the cooperative model and the acknowledgment of good faith’s constitutional stature. Thus, the duties of all those involved in the process are discussed, regarding both the formation of fair expectations and the imposition of sanctions against undesirable behaviors. As a distinguishing related effort, this thesis also seeks to explain the importance of substituing the use of the principle of proportionality, particularly post factum, i.e. based on the evidentiary result with the defense, for use of justifications prior to the adoption of the means of proof, which is an effective dialogic mechanism. This understanding of the cooperative process conditions the proposed revisit to the princípio de aquisição: the set of observations presented by the parties are subject to a series of problematizations based on a broad survey of precedents and situations with controversial resolutions as an effective empirical test for the hypotheses of this thesis.
Description
Keywords
processo civil prova ilícita boa-fé comportamentos processuais princípio da aquisição civil procedure unlawful evidence good-faith procedural behaviors aquisição processual