Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
---|---|---|---|---|
121.96 KB | JPEG | |||
2.92 MB | Adobe PDF |
Abstract(s)
Research selects as main issue the raison d’être of design activity, traditionally associate with the act of projecting —conceiving solutions that contribute to the breeding of the artificial world— and in is extend field: relations that design establish with the biosphere. We argue that design, as an act of project, do not pursuit only material answers, neither is closed nor finish at the moment that proceeds the delivery solution Design is not only a result, neither a visible shape, a configuration or a product, an object or an artefact. Is also a process: reflection, search for relations, making sense and implementation of social networks. Based on codesign, design will be no longer limited to the work of a master designer and moves to the space of action and collective responsibility. This interpretation sees design as a process of languaging or conversation, setting the common ground of meaning and understanding: collective decisions expressed by actions-solutions taken as a set, by shared responsibility and dialogue, or articulation between our needs and the vast reality of the biosphere. According to this point of view, acting in design is primarily a process which seeks promote balances, relationships and interactions (languaging), that come to the forefront or are structured by consensus and actions, which turn into solutions.
In this point of view, consensus is the main goal of design, because through them we conceived answers, not necessarily expressed by objects or material solutions. The idea of openness in design, the invitation to collective participation, is parcel of the contribution to improve relations between parts, as well between parts and the whole, boosting the nature of systemic relations: a web of people and the rest of the world, the remain elements and components of our system of life. In this study we reiterate that design will always be a search for alternatives or better situations, preferred ones, durables, well balanced and more equitable: process of questioning, redesign and improving what we do, how we do and how we live. According to our vision, making together is a fully, democratic and eco-social process to promote change and build improvement, because design cannot run (only) inside one level, the one of our priorities and needs: design also exists in relation, talking or in dialogue with the rest, design only gets sense if exists inside a wide circumstance.
Description
Keywords
Design participativo Design Consensualismo Relação Sustentabilidade Sociologia do design Sociologia da aprendizagem Teoria de Santiago