A carregar...
Publicação
Necessidades psicológicas e relações com bem-estar/distress psicológicos e sintomatologia : estudo da polaridade dialéctica prazer/dor
| Nome: | Descrição: | Tamanho: | Formato: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.29 MB | Adobe PDF |
Orientador(es)
Resumo(s)
O presente trabalho enquadra-se no Modelo de Complementaridade Paradigmática, o
qual concebe a regulação da satisfação das necessidades psicológicas como promotora
do Bem-estar psicológico. Neste âmbito, foram realizados dois estudos de natureza
quantitativa em momentos diferentes. O primeiro estuda a relação da necessidade
psicológica de Dor com o Bem-estar/Distress psicológicos e visa a selecção de itens que
integrem o instrumento de avaliação das necessidades psicológicas, usado no segundo
estudo. Este avalia as qualidades psicométricas da Escala de Regulação da Satisfação
das Necessidades psicológicas - versão reduzida (ERSN-57, Vasco, Bernardo, Cadilha,
Calinas, Conde, Ferreira, Fonseca, Guerreiro, Rodrigues, Romão, Rucha, Silva, &
Vargues-Conceição, 2013) e estuda a relação das necessidades psicológicas com o Bemestar/
Distress psicológicos e sintomatologia. No primeiro estudo foi aplicada a Escala
Dor (Vasco, Ferreira, Romão, Silva, & Vargues-Conceição, 2013) a uma amostra de
129 sujeitos, tendo sido aplicada a ERSN-57 a uma amostra de 271 sujeitos. Foi
utilizado um instrumento para a avaliação do Bem-estar/Distress psicológicos nos dois
estudos e dois instrumentos para avaliação da sintomatologia no segundo estudo. Os
resultados demonstram a consistência interna da maioria das subescalas da ERSN-57 e
uma estrutura factorial com sentido teórico. Verificam-se relações positivas entre a
regulação das necessidades psicológicas e o Bem-estar psicológico e relações negativas
entre a regulação das necessidades psicológicas e o Distress e sintomatologia. Por sua
vez, as discrepâncias das polaridades apresentam relações positivas com o Distress e
sintomatologia e relações negativas com o Bem-estar psicológico. A comparação de
grupos demonstra que o grupo de sujeitos com maior regulação em ambas as
necessidades da polaridade apresenta maior nível de Bem-estar e menor de Distress e
sintomatologia. Estes resultados apoiam o Modelo de Complementaridade
Paradigmática nos seus constructos centrais e relações com o Bem-estar/Distress e
sintomatologia.
This work is framed by the Paradigmatic Complementary Model, which conceives the regulation of psychological needs satisfaction as a promoter of psychological Wellbeing. Two quantitative studies were carried out in two different moments. The first one studies the relation of the psychological need of Pain with psychological Wellbeing/ Distress and it targets a selection of items that integrate the instrument used for evaluation of psychological needs on the second study. This one assesses the psychometric qualities of Psychological Needs Satisfaction Regulation Scale –reduced version (ERSN-57, Vasco, Bernardo, Cadilha, Calinas, Conde, Ferreira, Fonseca, Guerreiro, Rodrigues, Romão, Rucha, Silva, & Vargues-Conceição, 2013) and it studies the relation of psychological needs with psychological Well-being/Distress and symptomatology. In the first study the Pain Scale (Vasco, Ferreira, Romão, Silva, & Vargues-Conceição, 2013) was applied to a sample of 129 individuals and on the second study the ERSN-57 was applied to a sample of 271 individuals. An instrument was used for evaluation of psychological Well-being/Distress on both studies and two instruments were used for evaluation of symptomatology on the second study. The results show a reliable majority of the subscales of ERSN-57 and a factor structure with conceptual sense. The results also suggest positive relations of psychological needs with psychological Well-being/Distress and symptomatology, contrarily, the discrepancies of polarities show positive relations with psychological Distress and symptomatology and negative relations with psychological Well-being. The comparison between groups demonstrates that the group with higher regulation on both needs of polarity shows higher levels of psychological Well-being and low levels of psychological Distress and symptomatology. These results support the Paradigmatic Complementary Model in its central constructs and relations with psychological Well-being/Distress and symptomatology.
This work is framed by the Paradigmatic Complementary Model, which conceives the regulation of psychological needs satisfaction as a promoter of psychological Wellbeing. Two quantitative studies were carried out in two different moments. The first one studies the relation of the psychological need of Pain with psychological Wellbeing/ Distress and it targets a selection of items that integrate the instrument used for evaluation of psychological needs on the second study. This one assesses the psychometric qualities of Psychological Needs Satisfaction Regulation Scale –reduced version (ERSN-57, Vasco, Bernardo, Cadilha, Calinas, Conde, Ferreira, Fonseca, Guerreiro, Rodrigues, Romão, Rucha, Silva, & Vargues-Conceição, 2013) and it studies the relation of psychological needs with psychological Well-being/Distress and symptomatology. In the first study the Pain Scale (Vasco, Ferreira, Romão, Silva, & Vargues-Conceição, 2013) was applied to a sample of 129 individuals and on the second study the ERSN-57 was applied to a sample of 271 individuals. An instrument was used for evaluation of psychological Well-being/Distress on both studies and two instruments were used for evaluation of symptomatology on the second study. The results show a reliable majority of the subscales of ERSN-57 and a factor structure with conceptual sense. The results also suggest positive relations of psychological needs with psychological Well-being/Distress and symptomatology, contrarily, the discrepancies of polarities show positive relations with psychological Distress and symptomatology and negative relations with psychological Well-being. The comparison between groups demonstrates that the group with higher regulation on both needs of polarity shows higher levels of psychological Well-being and low levels of psychological Distress and symptomatology. These results support the Paradigmatic Complementary Model in its central constructs and relations with psychological Well-being/Distress and symptomatology.
Descrição
Tese de mestrado, Psicologia (Secção de Psicologia Clínica e da Saúde - Núcleo de Psicoterapia Cognitivo-Comportamental e Integrativa), Universidade de Lisboa, Faculdade de Psicologia, 2013
Palavras-chave
Necessidades psicológicas Bem-estar psicológico Complementaridade paradigmática Dor - aspectos psicológicos Teses de mestrado - 2013