| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24.86 MB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
Em 1966, o antropólogo Edward T. Hall desenvolveu a teoria de que os seres humanos mantêm entre si distâncias diferentes, dependendo do seu nível de intimidade. Estas distâncias íntimas, pessoais, sociais ou públicas, como o nome indica, variam também de acordo com o lugar ou situação social. Isto significa que em espaços públicos observamos mais distâncias de teor público, e em espaços mais contidos observamos mais interações de caráter íntimo ou pessoal. Mas o que acontece quando dois desconhecidos têm de partilhar um espaço de teor íntimo? Quais são as implicações no desenho desse espaço? É por essa premissa que se guia este trabalho, que investiga os quartos partilhados das residências de estudantes da Universidade de Lisboa. Tal investigação evidencia um problema: as residências públicas da Universidade de Lisboa regem-se pela mesma tipologia há décadas, adaptando-a ligeiramente, sem grandes mudanças. Há que entender a razão de não haver uma evolução notável de tipologias, e se este é, de facto, o modelo mais adequado às necessidades dos estudantes da atualidade. Com base nas áreas de estudo adjacentes à proxémia e à comunicação não verbal, juntamente com o contributo dos alunos alojados nas residências e a opinião dos arquitetos responsáveis por alguns dos casos de estudo, é possível entender como as restrições do regulamento afetam o desenho destes espaços. Por isso mesmo, são propostas pequenas soluções que vão ao encontro do regulamento e contribuem para um melhor bem-estar e respeito do espaço privado de cada habitante na tipologia construída, bem como sugestões de novas tipologias, que, se necessário, questionam determinados critérios do regulamento.
In 1966, anthropologist Edward T. Hall developed the theory that human beings maintain different distances between each other, depending on their level of intimacy. These intimate, personal, social or public distances, as the names suggest, also vary according to place or social context. This means that in public spaces we observe more distances of public character, and in more contained spaces we observe more interactions of an intimate or personal nature. But what happens when two strangers have to share an intimate space? What are the consequences for the design of that space? This is the premise behind the work, which investigates the shared rooms in student residences in the University of Lisbon. This research uncovers a problem: the public residences at the University of Lisbon have been using the same typology for decades, adapting it slightly, without any major changes. We need to understand why there hasn't been a significant evolution in typologies and whether this is, in fact, the typology best suited to the needs of today's students. Based on the areas of study adjacent to proxemics and non-verbal communication, together with the contribution of the students housed in the residences and the opinion of the architects responsible for some of the case studies, it is possible to understand how the restrictions of the regulations affect the design of these spaces. For this reason, small solutions are proposed that comply with the regulations and contribute to better well-being and respect for the private space of each inhabitant in the built typology, as well as suggestions for new typologies, which, if necessary, question certain criteria of the regulations.
In 1966, anthropologist Edward T. Hall developed the theory that human beings maintain different distances between each other, depending on their level of intimacy. These intimate, personal, social or public distances, as the names suggest, also vary according to place or social context. This means that in public spaces we observe more distances of public character, and in more contained spaces we observe more interactions of an intimate or personal nature. But what happens when two strangers have to share an intimate space? What are the consequences for the design of that space? This is the premise behind the work, which investigates the shared rooms in student residences in the University of Lisbon. This research uncovers a problem: the public residences at the University of Lisbon have been using the same typology for decades, adapting it slightly, without any major changes. We need to understand why there hasn't been a significant evolution in typologies and whether this is, in fact, the typology best suited to the needs of today's students. Based on the areas of study adjacent to proxemics and non-verbal communication, together with the contribution of the students housed in the residences and the opinion of the architects responsible for some of the case studies, it is possible to understand how the restrictions of the regulations affect the design of these spaces. For this reason, small solutions are proposed that comply with the regulations and contribute to better well-being and respect for the private space of each inhabitant in the built typology, as well as suggestions for new typologies, which, if necessary, question certain criteria of the regulations.
Description
Keywords
proxémia comunicação não-verbal espaço pessoal habitação entre desconhecidos residências universitárias
Pedagogical Context
Citation
Publisher
Faculdade Arquitetura, Universidade Lisboa