| Nome: | Descrição: | Tamanho: | Formato: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 381.45 KB | Adobe PDF |
Orientador(es)
Resumo(s)
In this research studies were carried out in two merging Public Administration institutions, one with a public labor
regime and the other a private one, which aimed to analyze culture and intermediary leadership. Study conducted
based on the action-research methodology, with (i) quantitative approach to analyze the organizational climate and
motivation with 79 leaders of institutions A and B using SPSS Statistic software, (ii) content analysis of 62
interviews with leaders from different hierarchical levels about the merger process and the perception of middle
managers, and (iii) narrative analysis of the main aspects of the merger process. In the first, quantitative study, the
organizational climate is analyzed, highlighting the role of middle management as facilitators of change. The
second, qualitative section interprets the results obtained in the interviews with the leaders, showing that the
process, from the start, did not have any convinced objectors, and that if there were any divisions, it would be due
to the conduct of the process and not to an option at the start. The third chapter recounts the most significant
episodes of the merger and reveals that the project gradually lost its meaning and became a mere change by decree.
A descriptive analysis is made of the diagnosis presented by a consulting company, whose results seem to point to
the "groupthink" phenomenon, reinforcing the Administration's expectations.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Public Administration; Mergers; Organizational Change; Middle Leadership.
