A carregar...
Publicação
A transferência de risco em PPP
| Nome: | Descrição: | Tamanho: | Formato: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 875.11 KB | Adobe PDF |
Orientador(es)
Resumo(s)
A adopção de modelos de Parcerias Público Privadas (PPP) justifica-se pelo facto de o Estado se deparar com um duplo desafio. Por um lado, a necessidade de aumentar a oferta, a qualidade e eficiência dos serviços públicos e, por outro, as reconhecidas limitações orçamentais existentes na grande maioria dos países. O presente trabalho explora o elemento fundamental e decisivo no desenvolvimento de modelos de PPP, em alternativa aos modelos de provisão tradicional de bens e serviços, nomeadamente a adequada e óptima alocação de risco entre os sectores público e privado. Realiza-se um estudo empírico, desenvolvendo-se uma análise comparativa da matriz de risco adoptada em um projecto SCUT, face à matriz de risco "ideal", em resultado das sensibilidades exteriorizadas pelos agentes do sector, com base no estudo COBRA 2004. Posteriormente, analisa-se a matriz de risco do projecto SCUT, decorrente da aplicação de um modelo teórico de alocação de risco desenvolvido por Oudot (2005), com o objectivo de efectuar uma análise crítica à matriz adoptada no projecto SCUT. A análise comparativa da matriz de risco "idealizada", revelou maior transferência de riscos para o parceiro privado, comparativamente à matriz de risco adoptada pelo modelo SCUT Norte Litoral. Contudo, da aplicação do modelo de Oudot ao projecto Norte Litoral resulta a existência de uma matriz de risco similar à defendida pelo autor, à excepção dos riscos partilhados entre as duas entidades.
The adoption of Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) by the State has been reasoned with the two-folded challenge it faces: the need to provide more, or improve the quality and efficiency of, public services and, on the other hand, imposed budgetary constraints faced by the State in the majority of the countries. The overall aim of this research is to explore the basic and, indeed, decisive element in the development of PPPs - adequate, optimum risk allocation between the public and private sectors - in substitution of traditional State procurement schemes. The risk matrix adopted in a selected SCUT (shadow toll) project was tested empirically in two assessments. First, we performed a comparative analysis of the risk matrix adopted in a SCUT project in opposition to the "ideal" risk matrix built on the COBRA 2004 findings, based on a questionnaire survey to relevant agents. Later, the risk matrix adopted in the SCUT project was analytically tested against the theoretical risk allocation model developed by Oudot (2005). To enable an improved verification of the success of the SCUT's adopted risk matrix an assessment instrument - hypothesis model - for evaluating risk allocation was developed. The assessment instrument was built on Oudot's (2005) model and extended to include the sharing of risks between the public and private sectors. Slightly different conclusions are drawn from both assessments. The comparative analysis against an "ideal" risk matrix suggests a sub-optimal transfer of risks to the private sector in the case of the SCUT project. Conversely, the SCUT's risk matrix is similar to the matrix developed by applying the Oudot model to the project, except for the risks shared between the public and private sectors. However, the SCUT's risk matrix indicates a good allocation of risks when measured against the hypothesis model.
The adoption of Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) by the State has been reasoned with the two-folded challenge it faces: the need to provide more, or improve the quality and efficiency of, public services and, on the other hand, imposed budgetary constraints faced by the State in the majority of the countries. The overall aim of this research is to explore the basic and, indeed, decisive element in the development of PPPs - adequate, optimum risk allocation between the public and private sectors - in substitution of traditional State procurement schemes. The risk matrix adopted in a selected SCUT (shadow toll) project was tested empirically in two assessments. First, we performed a comparative analysis of the risk matrix adopted in a SCUT project in opposition to the "ideal" risk matrix built on the COBRA 2004 findings, based on a questionnaire survey to relevant agents. Later, the risk matrix adopted in the SCUT project was analytically tested against the theoretical risk allocation model developed by Oudot (2005). To enable an improved verification of the success of the SCUT's adopted risk matrix an assessment instrument - hypothesis model - for evaluating risk allocation was developed. The assessment instrument was built on Oudot's (2005) model and extended to include the sharing of risks between the public and private sectors. Slightly different conclusions are drawn from both assessments. The comparative analysis against an "ideal" risk matrix suggests a sub-optimal transfer of risks to the private sector in the case of the SCUT project. Conversely, the SCUT's risk matrix is similar to the matrix developed by applying the Oudot model to the project, except for the risks shared between the public and private sectors. However, the SCUT's risk matrix indicates a good allocation of risks when measured against the hypothesis model.
Descrição
Mestrado em Gestão e Estratégia Industrial
Palavras-chave
parcerias público privadas matriz de alocação de risco optimização do risco SCUT public-private partnership risk allocation matrix risk optimization SCUT shadow tolls Oudot model
Contexto Educativo
Citação
Santos, Tiago Alexandre Carvalho dos. 2006. "A transferência de risco em PPP". Dissertação de Mestrado. Universidade Técnica de Lisboa. Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestão.
Editora
Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestão