A carregar...
Publicação
Relação entre o funcionamento da personalidade de mães e a tendência para problemas de internalização e externalização dos filhos numa população não clínica
| Nome: | Descrição: | Tamanho: | Formato: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.17 MB | Adobe PDF |
Autores
Orientador(es)
Resumo(s)
A presente investigação procurou compreender a relação entre diferentes traços de
personalidade das mães e os problemas emocionais e comportamentais dos filhos. A amostra
foi constituída por 50 crianças (6–9 anos; 24 do sexo masculino e 26 do sexo feminino) e
respetivas mães. Foram aplicados quatro instrumentos: um Questionário Sociodemográfico, e
as versões portuguesas do Inventário da Personalidade para o DSM-5 – Adultos (PID-5), do
Questionário do Comportamento da Criança 6-18 anos (CBCL 6-18) e do Questionário de
Comportamentos da Criança – Relatório do Professor (TRF 6-18). Foram comparados dois
grupos de crianças com pontuações distintas nas diferentes escalas do CBCL 6-18 e do TRF 6-
18 (Grupo Normativo e Grupo Bordeline ou Clínico), e outros quatro grupos – Grupo
Normativo (n = 25), Grupo Internalizante (n = 14), Grupo Externalizante (n = 6) e Grupo
Internalizante e Externalizante (n = 5) –, consoante os domínios e facetas do PID-5. A
diferenciação destes últimos foi, ainda, executada através da Análise Fatorial das
Correspondências Múltiplas. Relativamente às Escalas de Síndrome do CBCL 6-18 (à exceção
da escala Comportamento Delinquente), os resultados das mães das crianças do Grupo
Borderline ou Clínico, nalguns domínios e facetas do PID-5, foram significativamente
superiores comparativamente aos das mães das crianças do Grupo Normativo. Quanto aos
quatro grupos de crianças, as mães das crianças do Grupo Internalizante e Externalizante
apresentaram resultados significativamente superiores, comparativamente às mães das crianças
do Grupo Normativo, nos domínios Desinibição e Psicoticismo e nas facetas Hostilidade,
Depressividade, Crenças e Experiências Incomuns, Excentricidade e Desregulação Cognitiva
e Percetual. Os grupos que mais se diferenciaram foram os mais extremados (Normativo vs
Internalizante e Externalizante) e não os que caracterizam o funcionamento internalizante e
externalizante. Contudo, pontuações baixas nas facetas Labilidade Emocional e Submissão
surgem associadas ao Grupo Internalizante e resultados elevados nestas duas facetas e nas
facetas Procura de Atenção e Grandiosidade, bem como, resultados baixos nas facetas
Afastamento e Afetividade Restrita, associados ao Grupo Externalizante. As limitações e
implicações clínicas e futuras do presente estudo foram discutidas.
The present investigation sought to understand the relationship between mothers’ different personality traits and children's emotional and behavioral problems. The sample consisted of 50 children (6–9 years old; 24 males and 26 females) and their mothers. Four instruments were applied: a Sociodemographic Questionnaire, and the Portuguese versions of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 – Adults (PID-5), the Child Behavior Checklist 6-18 (CBCL 6-18) and the Teacher’s Report Form 6-18 (TRF 6-18). Two groups of children with different scores on the different scales of CBCL 6-18 and TRF 6-18 (Normative Group and Borderline or Clinical Group) were compared, and four other groups – Normative Group (n = 25), Internalizing Group (n = 14), Externalizing Group (n = 6) and Internalizing and Externalizing Group (n = 5) –, depending on the domains and facets of the PID-5. The differentiation of this was also carried out through the Multiple Correspondence Factor Analysis. Regarding the CBCL 6-18 Syndrome Scales (apart from the Delinquent Behavior scale), the results of mothers of children in the Borderline or Clinical Group, in some domains and facets of the PID-5, were significantly higher compared to those of mothers of children in the Normative Group. As for the four groups of children, mothers of children in the Internalizing and Externalizing Group showed significantly higher results, compared to mothers of children in the Normative Group, in the Disinhibition and Psychoticism domains and in the Hostility, Depressiveness, Unusual Beliefs and Experiences, Eccentricity and Cognitive and Perceptual Dysregulation facets. The groups that most differed were the most extreme (Normative vs Internalizing and Externalizing) and not those that characterize the internalizing and externalizing functioning. However, low scores in the Emotional Lability and Submission facets appear associated with the Internalizing Group and high results in these two facets and in the Attention-seeking and Grandiosity facets, as well as low results in the Withdrawal and Restricted Affectivity facets, associated with the Externalizing Group. The clinical and future limitations and implications of the present study were discussed.
The present investigation sought to understand the relationship between mothers’ different personality traits and children's emotional and behavioral problems. The sample consisted of 50 children (6–9 years old; 24 males and 26 females) and their mothers. Four instruments were applied: a Sociodemographic Questionnaire, and the Portuguese versions of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 – Adults (PID-5), the Child Behavior Checklist 6-18 (CBCL 6-18) and the Teacher’s Report Form 6-18 (TRF 6-18). Two groups of children with different scores on the different scales of CBCL 6-18 and TRF 6-18 (Normative Group and Borderline or Clinical Group) were compared, and four other groups – Normative Group (n = 25), Internalizing Group (n = 14), Externalizing Group (n = 6) and Internalizing and Externalizing Group (n = 5) –, depending on the domains and facets of the PID-5. The differentiation of this was also carried out through the Multiple Correspondence Factor Analysis. Regarding the CBCL 6-18 Syndrome Scales (apart from the Delinquent Behavior scale), the results of mothers of children in the Borderline or Clinical Group, in some domains and facets of the PID-5, were significantly higher compared to those of mothers of children in the Normative Group. As for the four groups of children, mothers of children in the Internalizing and Externalizing Group showed significantly higher results, compared to mothers of children in the Normative Group, in the Disinhibition and Psychoticism domains and in the Hostility, Depressiveness, Unusual Beliefs and Experiences, Eccentricity and Cognitive and Perceptual Dysregulation facets. The groups that most differed were the most extreme (Normative vs Internalizing and Externalizing) and not those that characterize the internalizing and externalizing functioning. However, low scores in the Emotional Lability and Submission facets appear associated with the Internalizing Group and high results in these two facets and in the Attention-seeking and Grandiosity facets, as well as low results in the Withdrawal and Restricted Affectivity facets, associated with the Externalizing Group. The clinical and future limitations and implications of the present study were discussed.
Descrição
Dissertação de mestrado, Psicologia Clínica e da Saúde (Área de Especialização em Psicologia Clínica Cognitivo-Comportamental Integrativa), 2022, Universidade de Lisboa, Faculdade de Psicologia
Palavras-chave
Traços de personalidade Mães Comportamento da criança Problemas de comportamento Perturbações da personalidade Perturbações emocionais Dissertações de mestrado - 2022