| Nome: | Descrição: | Tamanho: | Formato: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.07 MB | Adobe PDF |
Autores
Orientador(es)
Resumo(s)
Este relatório tem como objecto o desenvolvimento de capacidades de
argumentação oral em situação de debate, no Ensino Secundário, já que é um domínio
de indiscutível importância na formação do aluno, na escola, para além da escola e ao
longo da vida, e em que, como apontado em diversos estudos, os alunos manifestam
dificuldades.
O seu principal objectivo é apresentar uma intervenção didáctica desenhada no
âmbito da prática de ensino supervisionada e implementada numa turma do 12.º ano da
Escola Secundária de Camões, com o intuito de contribuir para a promoção do ensino
do oral formal na aula de Português. A intervenção didáctica desenvolveu-se na turma
alvo, fundamentalmente em três fases, ao longo de seis aulas de noventa minutos:
produção inicial (1.ª fase), sequência didáctica de quatro oficinas de argumentação oral
em contexto de debate (2.ª fase) e produção final (3.ª fase). A 1.ª e 3.ª fases, que
desempenham a função de pré-teste e pós-teste, foram aplicadas também a uma outra
turma do 12.º ano, que constituiu a turma de controlo.
Os resultados mostram que, ao contrário da turma de controlo, em que
praticamente não se regista evolução, a turma alvo apresenta, de um modo geral,
progressos significativos do pré-teste para o pós-teste, ainda que continuem a verificar-
-se dificuldades em alguns aspectos. Permitem corroborar a ideia de que urge trabalhar a
argumentação oral de forma explícita e sistemática, como objecto de programação e de
avaliação específicas, equiparado à leitura e à escrita.
The object of this report is the development of oratory competences, within a debate context, in Secondary Education. This is an area of unquestionable value in the formation of a student, at school, after school and, hereafter, throughout life, and in which, as several studies have indicated, students show difficulties. The main purpose of this report is to present a didactical intervention delineated in the context of a supervised teaching practice and implemented in a 12th grade class at Escola Secundária Luís de Camões (High School Luís de Camões), aiming to promote the teaching of oracy in Portuguese. This didactic intervention was developed at the target class fundamentally in three phases, during six classes of ninety minutes each: initial production (1st stage); didactic sequence of four workshops of oral argumentation within a debate context (2nd stage) and final production (3rd stage). The 1st and 3rd phases, that function as pre-test and post-test, have been applied to other 12th grade class, which was the control class. The results show that, unlike the control class, where we find practically no evolution, the target class reveals, in general, significant evolution from the pre-test to the post-test. Although one can still observe difficulties in some aspects, this results support the idea that it is important to work oral argumentation in an explicit and systematic way, as an object of specific programming and evaluation, at the same level of reading and writing practices.
The object of this report is the development of oratory competences, within a debate context, in Secondary Education. This is an area of unquestionable value in the formation of a student, at school, after school and, hereafter, throughout life, and in which, as several studies have indicated, students show difficulties. The main purpose of this report is to present a didactical intervention delineated in the context of a supervised teaching practice and implemented in a 12th grade class at Escola Secundária Luís de Camões (High School Luís de Camões), aiming to promote the teaching of oracy in Portuguese. This didactic intervention was developed at the target class fundamentally in three phases, during six classes of ninety minutes each: initial production (1st stage); didactic sequence of four workshops of oral argumentation within a debate context (2nd stage) and final production (3rd stage). The 1st and 3rd phases, that function as pre-test and post-test, have been applied to other 12th grade class, which was the control class. The results show that, unlike the control class, where we find practically no evolution, the target class reveals, in general, significant evolution from the pre-test to the post-test. Although one can still observe difficulties in some aspects, this results support the idea that it is important to work oral argumentation in an explicit and systematic way, as an object of specific programming and evaluation, at the same level of reading and writing practices.
Descrição
Relatório da prática de ensino supervisionada, Ensino de Português e Línguas Clássicas, Universidade de Lisboa, 2012
Palavras-chave
Ensino secundário (12ºano) Discurso argumentativo Debates Língua portuguesa Relatórios da prática de ensino supervisionada - 2012
