| Nome: | Descrição: | Tamanho: | Formato: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 856.12 KB | Adobe PDF |
Orientador(es)
Resumo(s)
This research aims to investigate judicial activism. It is a phenomenon widely debated in the
current context and it gains relevance mainly when it involves the realization of fundamental
rights. As the political judicialization- a theme also to be addressed in the present workactivism
is not present only in the Brazilian reality. The roots of this institute are traced to
North American Constitutionalism. The 1988 Brazilian Magna Carta inserted a series of
rights and guarantees into the legal system. Based on the principle of supremacy of the
Constitution, many magistrates assume the role of a protagonist, aiming at the realization of
constitutional values and purposes. This proactive conduct adopted by the Judiciary can
sometimes result in greater interference in the sphere of action of the Legislative and
Executive branches. This study will be guided by the possible collision between the activist
position of judges in guaranteeing fundamental rights and the principle of the separation of
powers. For that, the main focus of the investigation will be within the scope of the decisions
made by the Supreme Court. This study uses a qualitative methodology, with research based
on national and foreign doctrines, as well as scientific articles, laws and jurisprudence on the
subject at hand.
This research aims to investigate judicial activism. It is a phenomenon widely debated in the current context and it gains relevance mainly when it involves the realization of fundamental rights. As the political judicialization- a theme also to be addressed in the present workactivism is not present only in the Brazilian reality. The roots of this institute are traced to North American Constitutionalism. The 1988 Brazilian Magna Carta inserted a series of rights and guarantees into the legal system. Based on the principle of supremacy of the Constitution, many magistrates assume the role of a protagonist, aiming at the realization of constitutional values and purposes. This proactive conduct adopted by the Judiciary can sometimes result in greater interference in the sphere of action of the Legislative and Executive branches. This study will be guided by the possible collision between the activist position of judges in guaranteeing fundamental rights and the principle of the separation of powers. For that, the main focus of the investigation will be within the scope of the decisions made by the Supreme Court. This study uses a qualitative methodology, with research based on national and foreign doctrines, as well as scientific articles, laws and jurisprudence on the subject at hand.
This research aims to investigate judicial activism. It is a phenomenon widely debated in the current context and it gains relevance mainly when it involves the realization of fundamental rights. As the political judicialization- a theme also to be addressed in the present workactivism is not present only in the Brazilian reality. The roots of this institute are traced to North American Constitutionalism. The 1988 Brazilian Magna Carta inserted a series of rights and guarantees into the legal system. Based on the principle of supremacy of the Constitution, many magistrates assume the role of a protagonist, aiming at the realization of constitutional values and purposes. This proactive conduct adopted by the Judiciary can sometimes result in greater interference in the sphere of action of the Legislative and Executive branches. This study will be guided by the possible collision between the activist position of judges in guaranteeing fundamental rights and the principle of the separation of powers. For that, the main focus of the investigation will be within the scope of the decisions made by the Supreme Court. This study uses a qualitative methodology, with research based on national and foreign doctrines, as well as scientific articles, laws and jurisprudence on the subject at hand.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Direitos fundamentais Ativismo judicial Judicialização da política Separação de poderes Supremo Tribunal Federal Brasil
