A carregar...
Publicação
Perturbações relacionadas com substâncias e perturbações aditivas na população clínica : contributos do PID-5 e do PID5BF+M
| Nome: | Descrição: | Tamanho: | Formato: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 698 KB | Adobe PDF |
Autores
Orientador(es)
Resumo(s)
Esta dissertação teve como objetivo principal validar a versão portuguesa do PID5BF+M na população clínica. Para o efeito realizaram-se estudos de precisão e de validade convergente com o PID-5 e compararam-se os resultados do PID5BF+M e do PID-5 em duas amostras clínicas: uma com Perturbações Relacionadas com Substâncias e Perturbações Aditivas (grupo PSPA) e outra com outros diagnósticos (grupo OD). Além disto, procurou-se caracterizar e diferenciar os traços mais evidentes no grupo PSPA em comparação com o grupo OD. Assim, de acordo com a literatura, esperaram-se relações diretas e fortes entre os domínios e facetas destes instrumentos, bem como resultados elevados na Afetividade Negativa, no Antagonismo, na Desinibição e no Psicoticismo no grupo PSPA, em ambos os inventários de personalidade. Utilizou-se uma metodologia estatística descritiva e inferencial. Através dos resultados, verificou-se que o PID5BF+M apresentou uma consistência interna aceitável, mas aquém da do PID-5. A causa desta pouca confiabilidade pode advir de várias explicações que são averiguadas na discussão. Corroborou-se a convergência dos construtos entre os instrumentos. Assim, a importância na prática clínica do PID5BF+M é reforçada, harmonizando as classificações do ICD-11 e do DSM-5. Em relação à caracterização do grupo PSPA, em ambos os instrumentos, a Desinibição e o Antagonismo foram os domínios relevantes para as PSPA. E as facetas foram a Ansiedade de Separação, Manipulação, Falsidade, Grandiosidade, Irresponsabilidade, Impulsividade e as Crenças e Experiências Incomuns. Não obstante as limitações deste estudo, este confirma as potencialidades do PID5BF+M na caracterização de indivíduos com diagnóstico de Perturbações Relacionadas com Substâncias e Perturbações Aditivas.
The main objective of this dissertation was to validate the Portuguese version of the PID5BF+M in the clinical population. For this purpose, precision and convergent validity studies were carried out with the PID-5 and the results of the PID5BF+M and the PID-5 were compared in two clinical samples: one with Substance-Related Disorders and Addictive Disorders (PSPA group) and another with other diagnoses (OD group). Furthermore, an attempt was made to characterize and differentiate the most evident traits in the PSPA group in comparison with the OD group. Thus, according to the literature, direct and strong relationships between the domains and facets of these instruments were expected, as well as high results in Negative Affectivity, Antagonism, Disinhibition and Psychoticism in the PSPA group, in both personality inventories. A descriptive and inferential statistical methodology was used. Through the results, it was verified that the PID5BF+M presented an acceptable internal consistency, but below that of the PID-5. The cause of this little reliability can come from several explanations that are investigated in the discussion. The convergence of the constructs between the instruments was confirmed. Thus, the importance of PID5BF+M in clinical practice is reinforced, harmonizing the ICD-11 and DSM-5 classifications. Regarding the characterization of the PSPA group, in both instruments, Disinhibition and Antagonism were the relevant domains for PSPA. And the facets were Separation Anxiety, Manipulation, Deceitfulness, Grandiosity, Irresponsibility, Impulsivity, and Unusual Beliefs and Experiences. Despite the limitations of this study, it confirms the potential of PID5BF+M in the characterization of individuals diagnosed with Substance-Related Disorders and Addictive Disorders.
The main objective of this dissertation was to validate the Portuguese version of the PID5BF+M in the clinical population. For this purpose, precision and convergent validity studies were carried out with the PID-5 and the results of the PID5BF+M and the PID-5 were compared in two clinical samples: one with Substance-Related Disorders and Addictive Disorders (PSPA group) and another with other diagnoses (OD group). Furthermore, an attempt was made to characterize and differentiate the most evident traits in the PSPA group in comparison with the OD group. Thus, according to the literature, direct and strong relationships between the domains and facets of these instruments were expected, as well as high results in Negative Affectivity, Antagonism, Disinhibition and Psychoticism in the PSPA group, in both personality inventories. A descriptive and inferential statistical methodology was used. Through the results, it was verified that the PID5BF+M presented an acceptable internal consistency, but below that of the PID-5. The cause of this little reliability can come from several explanations that are investigated in the discussion. The convergence of the constructs between the instruments was confirmed. Thus, the importance of PID5BF+M in clinical practice is reinforced, harmonizing the ICD-11 and DSM-5 classifications. Regarding the characterization of the PSPA group, in both instruments, Disinhibition and Antagonism were the relevant domains for PSPA. And the facets were Separation Anxiety, Manipulation, Deceitfulness, Grandiosity, Irresponsibility, Impulsivity, and Unusual Beliefs and Experiences. Despite the limitations of this study, it confirms the potential of PID5BF+M in the characterization of individuals diagnosed with Substance-Related Disorders and Addictive Disorders.
Descrição
Dissertação de mestrado, Psicologia Clínica e da Saúde (Área de Especialização em Psicologia Clínica Dinâmica), 2023, Universidade de Lisboa, Faculdade de Psicologia
Palavras-chave
Comportamento aditivo Dependência a substâncias Transtornos de personalidade Psicologia clínica The Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) Dissertações de mestrado - 2023