A carregar...
Publicação
A (in) dispensabilidade de concordância do ministério público na celebração do acordo de colaboração premiada
| Nome: | Descrição: | Tamanho: | Formato: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.98 MB | Adobe PDF |
Autores
Orientador(es)
Resumo(s)
A colaboração premiada é um importante instrumento para obtenção de provas em crimes relacionados às organizações criminosas. Como se trata de um negócio jurídico que irradiará efeitos no processo penal, necessita ser realizada pelas partes competentes, observando as diretrizes da “justiça negociada”. Ainda que a
legislação ordinária outorgue legitimidade ativa para o delegado de polícia concretizar o acordo de colaboração, é imprescindível que o sistema jurídico seja interpretado à luz da CRFB. O Ministério Público é o principal protagonista para representar o Estado na persecução penal, seja para promover a ação penal pública ou dispor dela, assim como anuir com a concessão de benefícios penais (redução de pena, perdão judicial, v.g.). Os elementos probatórios que possam repercutir na ação penal necessitam estar em
consonância com a linha de pensamento do Ministério Público. Quando a formulação do acordo se dá por autoridade sem atribuição constitucional e contra a manifestação ministerial, além da violação ao sistema acusatório e prejuízo ao devido processo legal, acarreta insegurança jurídica ao acusado.
The Cooperation Agreement is an important instrument to obtain evidence in crimes related to criminal organizations. Considering that it's a legal negotiation that will radiate effects in the criminal action, it has to be done between the competent parts, observing the guidelines of negotiated justice. Even though the orginary legislation bestow active legitimacy to the Police Chieff, that can concretize the Cooperation Agreement, the juridical system must be interpreted according to the Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil (CRFB). The prosecutor is the main protagonist to represent the state in criminal persecution, whether to promote public prosecution or dispose of it, as well as to agree with de concession of criminal benefits (sentence reduction, judicial clemency, e.g.). The evidentiary elements that may have repercussions in the criminal action need to be in line with the line of thought of the prosecutor. When the agreement is formulated by an authority without constitutional attribution and against the prosecuting attorney manifestation, in addition to violating the accusatory system and prejudice to due process of law, it causes legal uncertainty for the defendant.
The Cooperation Agreement is an important instrument to obtain evidence in crimes related to criminal organizations. Considering that it's a legal negotiation that will radiate effects in the criminal action, it has to be done between the competent parts, observing the guidelines of negotiated justice. Even though the orginary legislation bestow active legitimacy to the Police Chieff, that can concretize the Cooperation Agreement, the juridical system must be interpreted according to the Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil (CRFB). The prosecutor is the main protagonist to represent the state in criminal persecution, whether to promote public prosecution or dispose of it, as well as to agree with de concession of criminal benefits (sentence reduction, judicial clemency, e.g.). The evidentiary elements that may have repercussions in the criminal action need to be in line with the line of thought of the prosecutor. When the agreement is formulated by an authority without constitutional attribution and against the prosecuting attorney manifestation, in addition to violating the accusatory system and prejudice to due process of law, it causes legal uncertainty for the defendant.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Colaboração premiada Polícia de investigação criminal Ministério Público Justiça negociada Teses de mestrado - 2023 Cooperation agreement Criminal investigation police Public Ministry Negotiated justice