A carregar...
Publicação
A bibliometric study on academic dishonesty research
| Nome: | Descrição: | Tamanho: | Formato: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.12 MB | Adobe PDF |
Autores
Orientador(es)
Resumo(s)
Educational policy and social sciences researchers have been studying dishonest behaviors
among students for a long time. In this bibliometric study we examine the
extant literature on academic dishonesty until 2017. We also analyze the specific case
of the literature on plagiarism (as a specific type of academic dishonesty) since it is
arguably one of the most common academic dishonest behavior. We aim at identifying
the intellectual structure of the field of academic dishonesty and plagiarism. Results
show that Donald L. McCabe (academic dishonesty) and Richard L. Marsh (plagiarism)
appear as the most productive authors. Furthermore, Whitley (Research in Higher
Education, 39(3), 235–274, 1998) “Factors associated with cheating among college
students: A review”, and Pennycook (TESOL Quarterly, 30(2), 201–230, 1996), entitled
“Borrowing others’ words: Text, ownership, memory, and plagiarism” are the most
cited publications on academic dishonesty and on plagiarism, respectively. Additionally,
a strong connection between the McCabe and Treviño articles emerged from the cocitation
analysis on academic dishonesty, and also a strong relationship between
Pennycook (TESOL Quarterly, 30(2), 201–230, 1996) and Pecorari (Journal of Second
Language Writing, 12(4), 317–345, 2003), suggesting that these articles are strongly
connected. Results suggest that these are the most influential authors and articles of the
field.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Academic Dishonesty Academic Cheating Academic Misconduct Plagiarism Bibliometrics
Contexto Educativo
Citação
Marques, Tânia; Nuno Reis and Jorge Gomes .(2019). “A bibliometric study on academic dishonesty research”. Journal of Academic Ethics, Vol. 17: pp. 169–191
Editora
Springer Nature