| Nome: | Descrição: | Tamanho: | Formato: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 844.28 KB | Adobe PDF |
Orientador(es)
Resumo(s)
Objective: To assess the repeatability and suitability for multicentre studies of MScanFit motor unit number estimation (MUNE), which involves modelling compound muscle action potential (CMAP) scans.
Methods: Fifteen groups in 9 countries recorded CMAP scans twice, 1-2 weeks apart in healthy subjects from abductor pollicis brevis (APB), abductor digiti minimi (ADM) and tibialis anterior (TA) muscles. The original MScanFit program (MScanFit-1) was compared with a revised version (MScanFit-2), designed to accommodate different muscles and recording conditions by setting the minimal motor unit size as a function of maximum CMAP.
Results: Complete sets of 6 recordings were obtained from 148 subjects. CMAP amplitudes differed significantly between centres for all muscles, and the same was true for MScanFit-1 MUNE. With MScanFit-2, MUNE differed less between centres but remained significantly different for APB. Coefficients of variation between repeats were 18.0% for ADM, 16.8% for APB, and 12.1% for TA.
Conclusions: It is recommended for multicentre studies to use MScanFit-2 for analysis. TA provided the least variable MUNE values between subjects and the most repeatable within subjects.
Significance: MScanFit was primarily devised to model the discontinuities in CMAP scans in patients and is less suitable for healthy subjects with smooth scans.
Descrição
© 2023 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology.
Palavras-chave
CMAP Scan MScanFit MUNE Motor unit number estimation Repeatability
Contexto Educativo
Citação
Clin Neurophysiol. 2023 Jul;151:92-99
Editora
Elsevier
