Logo do repositório
 
Publicação

Systematic reviews and meta-analysis published in indexed Portuguese medical journals: time trends and critical appraisal

dc.contributor.authorPrada, Luísa
dc.contributor.authorPrada, Ana
dc.contributor.authorMarques Antunes, Miguel
dc.contributor.authorFernandes, Ricardo M.
dc.contributor.authorCosta, João
dc.contributor.authorFerreira, Joaquim J
dc.contributor.authorCaldeira, Daniel
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-21T15:52:28Z
dc.date.available2022-04-21T15:52:28Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description© The Author(s) 2022. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativeco mmons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.pt_PT
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Over the last years, the number of systematic reviews published is steadily increasing due to the global interest in this type of evidence synthesis. However, little is known about the characteristics of this research published in Portuguese medical journals. This study aims to evaluate the publication trends and overall quality of these systematic reviews. Material and methods: This was a methodological study. We aimed the most visible Portuguese medical journals indexed in MEDLINE. Systematic reviews were identified through an electronic search (through PUBMED). We included systematic reviews published up to August 2020. Systematic reviews selection and data extraction were done independently by three authors. The overall quality critical appraisal using the A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews (AMSTAR-2) was independently assessed by three authors. Disagreements were solved by consensus. Results: Sixty-six systematic reviews published in 5 Portuguese medical journals were included. Most (n = 53; 80.3%) were systematic reviews without meta-analysis. Up to 2010 there was a steady increase in the number of systematic reviews published, followed by a period of great variability of publication, ranging from 1 to 10 in a given year. According to the systematic reviews' typology, most have been predominantly conducted to assess the effectiveness/efficacy of health interventions (n = 27; 40.9%). General and Internal Medicine (n = 20; 30.3%) was the most addressed field. Most systematic reviews (n = 46; 69.7%) were rated as being of "critically low-quality". Conclusions: There were consistent flaws in the methodological quality report of the systematic reviews included, particularly in establishing a prior protocol and not assessing the potential impact of the risk of bias on the results. Through the years, the number of systematic reviews published increased, yet their quality is suboptimal. There is a need to improve the reporting of systematic reviews in Portuguese medical journals, which can be achieved by better adherence to quality checklists/tools.pt_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
dc.identifier.citationBMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Apr 10;22(1):105pt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12874-022-01591-zpt_PT
dc.identifier.eissn1471-2288
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10451/52524
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.publisherSpringer Naturept_PT
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://bmcmedresmethodol.biomedcentral.com/pt_PT
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt_PT
dc.subjectAMSTAR-2pt_PT
dc.subjectMeta-analysispt_PT
dc.subjectPortugalpt_PT
dc.subjectQualitypt_PT
dc.subjectSystematic reviewpt_PT
dc.titleSystematic reviews and meta-analysis published in indexed Portuguese medical journals: time trends and critical appraisalpt_PT
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.issue1pt_PT
oaire.citation.titleBMC Medical Research Methodologypt_PT
oaire.citation.volume22pt_PT
person.familyNamePrada
person.familyNameFernandes
person.familyNameCosta
person.familyNameFerreira
person.familyNameCaldeira
person.givenNameLuísa
person.givenNameRicardo
person.givenNameJoão
person.givenNameJoaquim J
person.givenNameDaniel
person.identifier309018
person.identifier480560
person.identifier1624753
person.identifier.ciencia-id2610-0EC0-FE33
person.identifier.ciencia-id2616-79AF-3D42
person.identifier.ciencia-id7D15-5CD6-6159
person.identifier.ciencia-idAA19-EC35-8D01
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-7082-7594
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-0887-8219
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-7253-6475
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-5831-4921
person.identifier.orcid0000-0003-3950-5113
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-2520-5673
person.identifier.ridC-7501-2015
person.identifier.scopus-author-id24436565500
person.identifier.scopus-author-id55499748300
person.identifier.scopus-author-id7403252466
person.identifier.scopus-author-id36623384200
rcaap.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typearticlept_PT
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationd2fb22d2-cf54-443f-974a-917b57c45856
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationfb773c1d-f321-4c17-8f74-29d3fd5a96aa
relation.isAuthorOfPublication862be38f-2247-424c-b26c-d3bdda4474be
relation.isAuthorOfPublication0924f405-2d3a-4914-9097-24aa639bd97f
relation.isAuthorOfPublication54d84fe7-2cbd-4ddc-bce2-0ff2bd7c4cc9
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationeba36bb8-5eb3-4ccc-88f8-bd7012d42382
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryfb773c1d-f321-4c17-8f74-29d3fd5a96aa

Ficheiros

Principais
A mostrar 1 - 1 de 1
A carregar...
Miniatura
Nome:
Systematic_reviews.pdf
Tamanho:
1.19 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format