A carregar...
Publicação
A prova por declarações de parte no código de processo civil
| Nome: | Descrição: | Tamanho: | Formato: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.02 MB | Adobe PDF |
Autores
Orientador(es)
Resumo(s)
A presente dissertação de mestrado tem como pano de fundo o estudo da prova por declarações de parte.
Várias foram as alterações feitas ao Código de Processo Civil. As inovações introduzidas pela introdução da Lei 41/2013 de 26 de Junho, trouxeram consigo alguma curiosidade, perplexidade e críticas perante as novidades.
As alterações feitas à fase de instrução criaram algumas dúvidas, principalmente no tocante aos novos meios probatórios. Referimo-nos portanto à prova por declarações de parte e às verificações não judiciais qualificadas.
O actual Código de Processo Civil vem saciar o desejo das partes de intervirem oralmente e por sua própria iniciativa até ao início das alegações orais em primeira instância.
Até à referida data a parte via a sua participação activa e directa no desenrolar do litígio limitada pelas normas impostas no artigo 627.º do CPC, estando estes sujeitos processuais impedidos de depor como testemunhas os que na causa possam depor como partes. O preceituado neste artigo mantêm-se no actual artigo 496.º do CPC. Levanta-se então a questão se a parte é ou não uma testemunha?
Com o presente trabalho cumpre-nos concluir que esta é uma testemunha em lato sensu da ocorrência dos factos, pois presenciou directa e pessoalmente tendo uma percepção sensorial da ocorrência do facto. Mas não será uma testemunha para os efeitos do processo civil.
A articulação independente deste meio probatório trata-se para nós de uma intenção obvia de autonomizar este meio de prova, atribuindo-lhe igual mérito na sua livre valoração, tal como, todos os meios probatórios que se regem por esta valoração.
Não sendo portanto um indício de prova ou comportando um valor probatório inferior.
O Regime previsto no artigo 466.º em consonância com a supletividade da aplicação do regime previsto para o depoimento de parte, apesar de escasso quanto a especificações é possível extrair-se dele, com clareza, que a prova por declarações de parte poderá ser requerida pela própria ou oficiosamente. O requerimento poderá ser feito nos respectivos articulados ou até às alegações orais em primeira instância, no qual, deverá constar a discriminação dos factos sobre os quais irá recair, caso não aconteça o Juiz deverá ex officio convidar a parte a suprir tal insuficiência.
A Prova por Declarações de Parte está sujeita à livre apreciação do julgador, excepto quando dela resulte a confissão, que terá valor de prova plena.
Entendemos que embora a parte tenha um interesse directo no ganho da causa, este meio probatório será auto-suficiente para, em determinadas situações, formar a convicção do julgador quanto à boa decisão da causa.
Valerá, assim, tanto para todas as espécies de acções declarativas, nos termos do artigo 10.º do CPC como para os procedimentos cautelares (comuns e específicos), atendendo sempre ao circunstancialismo da causa.
The present Master degree dissertation has the study of the evidence by party's declarations as background. The modifications made to the civil process code were several. The innovations introduced by the law 41/2013 of july 26th, brought with it some curiosity, perplexity and critics towards the news. The alterations made to the instruction fase created some doubts, mainly on what concerns the new mean of evidence. We are therefore referring to evidence by party's declarations and to the qualified non judicial verifications. The present civil process code comes to indulge the part desire to intervene oraly and by their own initiative until the beginning of the oral alegations in first instance. Until the mentioned date the part saw his active and direct participation in the unfolding of the litigation limited by rules imposed in the article 627.º from CPC, beeing these processual subjects disabled to testify as witnesses, those that in the cause might testify as parts. The reading of this article can still be found int the present civil process code in the current article 496.º from CPC. the question then rises, is the part a witness or not? With the current work we conclude that it is a witness in latu sensu of the occurrence facts because he has witnessed personaly and directly having a sensorial perception of the occurrence of the facts. But will not be a witness for civil process effects. To us the independent articulation of this mean of evidence is about an obvious intention of autonomize this mean of evidence, giving it equal merit in its free valuation, just like, all the means of evidence which are governed by this valuation.Thus not being an indication of proof or having a lower probationary value. The Scheme provided for in Article 466.º in line with the supplementary application of the regime provided for the testimony of a party, although scarce in terms of specifications can be clearly extracted from it that evidence by a party's declarations may be required by itself or ex officio. The request may be made in the respective pleadings or even the oral arguments in the first instance, which should include a breakdown of the facts on which it will fall, in case it does not happen the Judge should ex officio invite the party to remedy such insufficiency.The evidence by party's declarations is subject to the free appraisal of the judge, except when it results in confession, wich shall have full evidential value. We understand that although the party has a direct interest in the cause gain,this means of evidence will be self-sufficient to, in certain situations, form the conviction of the judge as to the good decision of the cause. It will thus apply to all kinds of declarative actions, in acordance with the article 10.º of CPP and for precautionary procedures (common and specific), always taking into account the circumstances of the case. Therefore we are faced with a probative element in its fullness.
The present Master degree dissertation has the study of the evidence by party's declarations as background. The modifications made to the civil process code were several. The innovations introduced by the law 41/2013 of july 26th, brought with it some curiosity, perplexity and critics towards the news. The alterations made to the instruction fase created some doubts, mainly on what concerns the new mean of evidence. We are therefore referring to evidence by party's declarations and to the qualified non judicial verifications. The present civil process code comes to indulge the part desire to intervene oraly and by their own initiative until the beginning of the oral alegations in first instance. Until the mentioned date the part saw his active and direct participation in the unfolding of the litigation limited by rules imposed in the article 627.º from CPC, beeing these processual subjects disabled to testify as witnesses, those that in the cause might testify as parts. The reading of this article can still be found int the present civil process code in the current article 496.º from CPC. the question then rises, is the part a witness or not? With the current work we conclude that it is a witness in latu sensu of the occurrence facts because he has witnessed personaly and directly having a sensorial perception of the occurrence of the facts. But will not be a witness for civil process effects. To us the independent articulation of this mean of evidence is about an obvious intention of autonomize this mean of evidence, giving it equal merit in its free valuation, just like, all the means of evidence which are governed by this valuation.Thus not being an indication of proof or having a lower probationary value. The Scheme provided for in Article 466.º in line with the supplementary application of the regime provided for the testimony of a party, although scarce in terms of specifications can be clearly extracted from it that evidence by a party's declarations may be required by itself or ex officio. The request may be made in the respective pleadings or even the oral arguments in the first instance, which should include a breakdown of the facts on which it will fall, in case it does not happen the Judge should ex officio invite the party to remedy such insufficiency.The evidence by party's declarations is subject to the free appraisal of the judge, except when it results in confession, wich shall have full evidential value. We understand that although the party has a direct interest in the cause gain,this means of evidence will be self-sufficient to, in certain situations, form the conviction of the judge as to the good decision of the cause. It will thus apply to all kinds of declarative actions, in acordance with the article 10.º of CPP and for precautionary procedures (common and specific), always taking into account the circumstances of the case. Therefore we are faced with a probative element in its fullness.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Processo civil Livre apreciação da prova Confissão Depoimento de parte Valoração da prova Teses de mestrado - 2018