Logo do repositório
 
A carregar...
Miniatura
Publicação

Efficacy of a theory‐driven program to implement alcohol screening and brief interventions in primary health‐care: a cluster randomized controlled trial

Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo.
Nome:Descrição:Tamanho:Formato: 
Efficacy_driven.pdf1.4 MBAdobe PDF Ver/Abrir

Orientador(es)

Resumo(s)

Background and aims: Screening and brief interventions (SBI) in primary health-care practices (PHCP) are effective in reducing reported alcohol consumption, but have not been routinely implemented. Most programs seeking to improve implementation rates have lacked a theoretical rationale. This study aimed to test whether a theory-based intervention for PHCPs could significantly increase alcohol SBI delivery. Design: Two-arm, cluster-randomized controlled, parallel, 12-month follow-up, trial. Setting: PHCPs in Portugal. Participants: Staff from 12 PHCPs (n = 222, 81.1% women): nurses (35.6%), general practitioners (28.8%), receptionists (26.1%) and family medicine residents (9.5%); patients screened for alcohol use: intervention n = 8062; controls n = 58. Intervention and comparator: PHCPs were randomized to receive a training and support program (n = 6; 110 participants) tailored to the barriers and facilitators for implementing alcohol SBIs following the principles of the Behavior Change Wheel/Theoretical Domains Framework approach, or to a waiting-list control (n = 6; 112 participants). Training was delivered over the first 12 weeks of the trial. Measurements: The primary outcome was the proportion of eligible patients screened (unit of analysis: patient list). Secondary outcomes included the brief intervention (BI) rate per screen-positive patient and the population-based BI rate (unit of analysis: patient list), and changes in health providers' perceptions of barriers to implementation and alcohol-related knowledge (unit of analysis: health provider). Findings: The implementation program had a significant effect on the screening activity in the intervention practices compared with control practices at the 12-month follow-up (21.7% vs. 0.16%, intention-to-treat analysis, p = 0.003). Although no significant difference was found on the BI rate per screen-positive patient (intervention 85.7% vs. control 63.6%, p = 0.55, Bayes factor = 0.28), the intervention was effective in increasing the population-based BI rate (intervention 0.69% vs. control 0.02%, p = 0.006). Health providers in the intervention arm reported fewer barriers to SBI implementation and higher levels of alcohol-related knowledge at 12-month follow-up than those in control practices. Conclusion: A theory-based implementation program, which included training and support activities, significantly increased alcohol screening and population-based brief intervention rates in primary care.

Descrição

© 2021 Society for the Study of Addiction

Palavras-chave

Alcohol-induced disorders Counselling Primary health-care Psychological theory Randomized controlled trial Screening

Contexto Educativo

Citação

Addiction. 2022 Jun;117(6):1609-1621

Projetos de investigação

Unidades organizacionais

Fascículo

Editora

Wiley

Licença CC

Métricas Alternativas