Logo do repositório
 
Publicação

Do people see the way things are as they should be? Measuring the individual differences in system justification

dc.contributor.authorSilva, W. A. D.
dc.contributor.authorPereira, Cicero Roberto
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-28T11:07:35Z
dc.date.available2022-03-28T11:07:35Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractSystem justification theory contends that people are motivated to consider the social arrangements as just, legitimate and necessary. The adequate assessment of individual differences regarding this motivation is a critical issue in this field, especially in a cultural context of profound social inequalities like Brazil. We addressed this issue by proposing an adapted and modified version of the General System Justification Scale (GSJS). In Study 1, we explored the content validity of the GSJS through expert analysis. In Study 2 (n = 305), we conducted exploratory factor analysis and found a single-factor structure. In Study 3 (n = 307), we confirmed this factorial structure. In Study 4 (n = 227), we estimated the convergent-discriminating and incremental validity of the SJS by comparing it with correlated constructs. Finally, in Study 5 (n = 100), we experimentally manipulated a news story about a high (vs. low) threat to the Brazilian system, and observed the predictive validity of the GSJS. In general, the results showed that the new version of the GSJS is a valid and reliable measure. Furthermore, they suggest the new version of the GSJS is a useful tool to measure individual differences in justification of social inequalities in a context of deep social disparities.pt_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionpt_PT
dc.identifier.citationDo people see the way things are as they should be? Measuring the individual differences in system justification. Current Psychology. Published online 15 Março 2022pt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s12144-022-02992-5pt_PT
dc.identifier.issn1046-1310
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10451/52011
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.publisherSpringerpt_PT
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12144-022-02992-5#citeaspt_PT
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt_PT
dc.subjectSystem justificationpt_PT
dc.subjectMeasurespt_PT
dc.subjectSocial inequalitypt_PT
dc.subjectStatus quopt_PT
dc.subjectPerception of justicept_PT
dc.titleDo people see the way things are as they should be? Measuring the individual differences in system justificationpt_PT
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage20pt_PT
oaire.citation.startPage1pt_PT
oaire.citation.titleCurrent Psychologypt_PT
person.familyNameDantas Silva
person.familyNamePereira
person.givenNameWashington Allysson
person.givenNameCicero Roberto
person.identifierAAA-4516-2021
person.identifier.ciencia-idEA10-978E-4BE2
person.identifier.ciencia-idD918-494B-6DAF
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-0556-8936
person.identifier.orcid0000-0003-3406-3985
person.identifier.ridM-6011-2013
person.identifier.scopus-author-id36958271200
rcaap.rightsrestrictedAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typearticlept_PT
relation.isAuthorOfPublication208d9168-eee8-4edb-98c7-1c2c07dea28c
relation.isAuthorOfPublication51ef31ea-bb2f-4d01-ba20-c72a8e7b7d5a
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery51ef31ea-bb2f-4d01-ba20-c72a8e7b7d5a

Ficheiros

Principais
A mostrar 1 - 1 de 1
A carregar...
Miniatura
Nome:
ICS_CRPereira_Do_people.pdf
Tamanho:
1.02 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Coleções