| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 293.46 KB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
This blog entry discusses the use of a ‘quasi-quantitative’ mapping method as part of comparative case-study research for a PhD, in the context of (unforeseen) constraints and scarce resources. Specifically, I present the challenges I faced working in different contexts, with different resources and in different temporal windows – and the subsequent processes of adaptation of the research design. First, I introduce the PhD research to ground the decision to use maps. Second, I discuss how a method designed for the city where I carried out my PhD (Palermo, Italy) was partially delusional in the city where I developed a second case-study (Lisbon, Portugal) and how I had to steer the research design as a consequence. Third, I reflect on the implications of a (too?) ambitious research design and summarise the lessons I have learnt with broader relevance for comparative case-study research
Description
Keywords
Research methods Mapping Case study research Comparative urban studies
Pedagogical Context
Citation
Tulumello S. (2017). Semi-quantitative mapping in comparative case-study research: Resources, constraints and research design adaptation, LSE Field Research Method Lab, 7 February. Retrieved from: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/fieldresearch/2017/02/07/semi-quantitative-mapping-in-comparative-case-study-research/.
