Publication
Opacity, Know-How States, and their Content
| dc.contributor.author | Toribio, Josefa | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2016-11-02T10:27:08Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2016-11-02T10:27:08Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2015-05 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The main goal of this paper is to defend the thesis that the content of know-how states is an accuracy assessable type of nonconceptual content. My argument proceeds in two stages. I argue, first, that the intellectualist distinction between types of ways of grasping the same kind of content is uninformative unless it is tied in with a distinction between kinds of contents. Second, I consider and reject the objection that, if the content of know-how states is non-conceptual, it will be mysterious why attributions of knowing how create opaque contexts. I show that the objection conflates two distinct issues: the nature of the content of know-how states and the semantic evaluability of know-how ascriptions. | pt_PT |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0873-626X | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10451/24949 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | pt_PT |
| dc.peerreviewed | yes | pt_PT |
| dc.publisher | Universidade de Lisboa, Faculdade de Letras, Centro de Filosofia | pt_PT |
| dc.relation.publisherversion | www.disputatio.com | pt_PT |
| dc.subject | Accuracy conditions | pt_PT |
| dc.subject | Intellectualism | pt_PT |
| dc.subject | Know-how | pt_PT |
| dc.subject | Non-conceptual content | pt_PT |
| dc.subject | Opacity | pt_PT |
| dc.title | Opacity, Know-How States, and their Content | pt_PT |
| dc.type | journal article | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| oaire.citation.endPage | 83 | pt_PT |
| oaire.citation.startPage | 61 | pt_PT |
| oaire.citation.title | Disputatio | pt_PT |
| oaire.citation.volume | Vol. VII, nº 40 | pt_PT |
| rcaap.rights | openAccess | pt_PT |
| rcaap.type | article | pt_PT |