| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 178.52 KB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
The main goal of this paper is to defend the thesis that the content of know-how states is an accuracy assessable type of nonconceptual content. My argument proceeds in two stages. I argue, first, that the intellectualist distinction between types of ways of grasping the same kind of content is uninformative unless it is tied in with a distinction between kinds of contents. Second, I consider and reject the objection that, if the content of know-how states is non-conceptual, it will be mysterious why attributions of knowing how create opaque contexts. I show that the objection conflates two distinct issues: the nature of the content of know-how states and the semantic evaluability of know-how ascriptions.
Description
Keywords
Accuracy conditions Intellectualism Know-how Non-conceptual content Opacity
Pedagogical Context
Citation
Publisher
Universidade de Lisboa, Faculdade de Letras, Centro de Filosofia
