| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 706.04 KB | Adobe PDF |
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
This paper probes the internal governance of research journals by focusing on the editorial boards of leading African studies academic journals. We submit editorships to systematic scrutiny through a number of perspectives: geography, gender, institutional affiliation, research performance, entry/exit, etc. Overall, leading journals in the area of African studies are found to be less inclusive than expected: under a quarter of the editors are Africa-based scholars while women are even scarcer. Observations on editorial inflation, repeat editors, interlocking editorships and differentiated journal positionings are also made possible by taking a quantitative approach to editorial evidence. What we refer as ‘‘editormetrics’’ thus suggests the need for further debate regarding the managerial rules and roles of journals. This perspective may, and perhaps should, inform other evidence based appraisals of the journal ‘‘industry’’ and the research policy scene at large
Description
Keywords
Editorships Editormetrics Research Governance Editorial Inflation Interlocking Editorships African Studies Global South
Pedagogical Context
Citation
Mendonça, Sandro; João Pereira and Manuel Ennes Ferreira .(2018). “Gatekeeping African studies: What does ‘editormetrics’ indicate about journal governance?”. Scientometrics, Volume 117: pp. 1513–1534. 2018
Publisher
Springer Nature