A carregar...
Publicação
A teoria da cegueira deliberada no common law e a interpretação do dolo no civil law
| Nome: | Descrição: | Tamanho: | Formato: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.37 MB | Adobe PDF |
Autores
Orientador(es)
Resumo(s)
Considera a compatibilidade legal e teórica da Teoria da Cegueira Deliberada do Common Law no sistema jurídico do Civil Law, trazendo possíveis soluções jurídicas ao problema do desconhecimento voluntário no dolo. Aborda a origem da cegueira deliberada, o sistema de imputação no Common Law, os tipos de imputação subjetiva no direito anglo-americano, base de referência do Direito Continental e Latino-Americano para seu transplante legal, e sua posição normativa. Distingue a cegueira deliberada em sentido estrito, objeto central do estudo, das demais formas de cegueira. Investiga na jurisprudência estadunidense, estadual e federal, anterior e posterior ao caso Global-Tech, Inc., et al. vs. SEB S.A. Demonstra a função exercida pela cegueira deliberada no direito anglo-americano, os problemas relacionados aos limites entre categorias subjetivas e a compreensão sobre o conhecimento, estabelecendo um paralelo com o entendimento sobre o conhecimento acerca dos elementos do tipo na teoria do crime no Civil Law. Analisa a origem da cegueira deliberada no direito brasileiro e as formas como sua jurisprudência aplica a teoria no âmbito da justiça federal e no da estadual. Sintetiza a estrutura do dolo no respectivo ordenamento, destacando o emprego equivocado da cegueira deliberada como supedâneo do dolo eventual. Considera inaplicável a Teoria da Cegueira Deliberada ao crime de lavagem de dinheiro, seja em relação ao conhecimento do delito antecedente ou aos honorários maculados. Ressalta o diminuto debate sobre o tema na doutrina e jurisprudência portuguesa, ressalvadas as abordagens isoladas quanto ao branqueamento de capitais. Busca identificar se as teorias ontológicas e normativas do dolo apresentam soluções a casos de desconhecimento voluntário, tornando despiciendo o transplante da cegueira deliberada ao Civil Law. Com base nos níveis conceitual e aplicativo do dolo, considera as interpretações e soluções das doutrinas ontológicas aos comportamentos em cegueira deliberada. Na mesma linha, mas na perspectiva normativa, se indicadores externos de conduta podem abranger satisfatoriamente comportamentos em cegueira deliberada, estabilizando os problemas típicos desse estado subjetivo no Civil Law. Conclui ser incompatível a cegueira deliberada com o sistema jurídico do Civil Law. Apresenta solução de tratamento à cegueira deliberada em sentido estrito ao sistema jurídico do Civil Law na perspectiva dominante da doutrina de dolo como conhecimento e vontade.
It considers the legal and theoretical compatibility of the Common Law theory of Willful Blindness in the Civil Law legal system, bringing possible legal solutions to the problem of voluntary ignorance in the act of intention to commit a crime. It addresses the origin of Willful Blindness, the imputation system in Common Law, the types of subjective imputation in Anglo-American law, the reference base of continental and Latin American law for its legal transplantation, and its normative position. It distinguishes willful blindness in the strict sense, the central object of the study, from other forms of blindness. Investigates in American state and federal jurisprudence, before and after the Global-Tech, Inc., et al. v. SEB S.A. It demonstrates the role played by Willful Blindness in Anglo-American law, the problems related to the limits between subjective categories and the understanding of acknowledgement, establishing a parallel with the understanding of acknowledgement about the elements of a felony in the theory of crime in Civil Law. It analyzes the origin of Willful Blindness in Brazilian law and the ways in which its jurisprudence applies the theory in the scope of federal and state justice. It summarizes the structure of intent in the respective legal order, highlighting the mistaken use of Willful Blindness as a basis for eventual intent. It considers the theory of Willful Blindness to the crime of money laundering to be inapplicable, whether in relation to knowledge of the preceding offense or to tainted fees. It highlights the small debate on the subject in Portuguese doctrine and jurisprudence, with the exception of isolated approaches regarding money laundering. It seeks to identify whether the ontological and normative theories of fraud present solutions to cases of voluntary ignorance, making the transplantation of Willful Blindness to Civil Law negligible. Based on the conceptual and application levels of deceit, it considers the interpretations and solutions of ontological doctrines to behaviors in Willful Blindness. Along the same lines, but from a normative perspective, whether external indicators of conduct can satisfactorily cover behaviors in Willful Blindness, stabilizing the typical problems of this subjective state in Civil Law. It concludes that Willful Blindness is incompatible with the Civil Law legal system. It presents a treatment solution for deliberate blindness in the strict sense of the Civil Law legal system in the dominant perspective of the doctrine of intent as knowledge and will.
It considers the legal and theoretical compatibility of the Common Law theory of Willful Blindness in the Civil Law legal system, bringing possible legal solutions to the problem of voluntary ignorance in the act of intention to commit a crime. It addresses the origin of Willful Blindness, the imputation system in Common Law, the types of subjective imputation in Anglo-American law, the reference base of continental and Latin American law for its legal transplantation, and its normative position. It distinguishes willful blindness in the strict sense, the central object of the study, from other forms of blindness. Investigates in American state and federal jurisprudence, before and after the Global-Tech, Inc., et al. v. SEB S.A. It demonstrates the role played by Willful Blindness in Anglo-American law, the problems related to the limits between subjective categories and the understanding of acknowledgement, establishing a parallel with the understanding of acknowledgement about the elements of a felony in the theory of crime in Civil Law. It analyzes the origin of Willful Blindness in Brazilian law and the ways in which its jurisprudence applies the theory in the scope of federal and state justice. It summarizes the structure of intent in the respective legal order, highlighting the mistaken use of Willful Blindness as a basis for eventual intent. It considers the theory of Willful Blindness to the crime of money laundering to be inapplicable, whether in relation to knowledge of the preceding offense or to tainted fees. It highlights the small debate on the subject in Portuguese doctrine and jurisprudence, with the exception of isolated approaches regarding money laundering. It seeks to identify whether the ontological and normative theories of fraud present solutions to cases of voluntary ignorance, making the transplantation of Willful Blindness to Civil Law negligible. Based on the conceptual and application levels of deceit, it considers the interpretations and solutions of ontological doctrines to behaviors in Willful Blindness. Along the same lines, but from a normative perspective, whether external indicators of conduct can satisfactorily cover behaviors in Willful Blindness, stabilizing the typical problems of this subjective state in Civil Law. It concludes that Willful Blindness is incompatible with the Civil Law legal system. It presents a treatment solution for deliberate blindness in the strict sense of the Civil Law legal system in the dominant perspective of the doctrine of intent as knowledge and will.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Direito penal Dolo Negligência Branqueamento de capitais Portugal Brasil Teses de doutoramento - 2024