A carregar...
Publicação
(In)admissibilidade do ato notarial de reconhecimento de assinatura na formação do título executivo
| Nome: | Descrição: | Tamanho: | Formato: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.28 MB | Adobe PDF |
Orientador(es)
Resumo(s)
A legislação processual civil e as sucessivas reformas têm providenciado várias alterações às normas nela constantes, relativamente a diversos aspetos do processo civil português.
Um desses aspetos traduziu-se nas sucessivas alterações promovidas ao elenco de títulos executivos. Dos vários títulos executivos previstos no Código do Processo Civil, dá-se especial enfoque ao que se encontra previsto na alínea b) do artigo 703.º da Lei n.º 41/2013, de 26 de junho, que aprovou o Código do Processo Civil atualmente em vigor.
Da referida norma resulta que os documentos autênticos ou autenticados, que importem o reconhecimento, por Notário ou por outras entidades ou profissionais com a competência para a prática dos referidos atos, e cujos documentos importem constituição ou reconhecimento de qualquer obrigação.
Em comparação com a legislação processual civil anteriormente vigente, as alterações promovidas pela lei referida revelaram-se restritivas do elenco de títulos executivos de natureza extrajudicial, vedando-se a admissibilidade dos documentos particulares assinados no elenco de títulos executivos.
Os documentos autênticos e os documentos particulares autenticados são atos notariais. Do elenco de atos notariais, o legislador não consagrou expressamente o ato notarial de reconhecimento de assinatura aposta em documento particular no elenco de títulos executivos.
Nesse sentido, o objetivo da presente dissertação será refletir sobre a admissibilidade ou inadmissibilidade do documento particular com assinatura reconhecida enquanto documento passível de constar no elenco de títulos executivos, atendendo não só à evolução história e soluções de outras ordens jurídicas, como também à idoneidade e importância da atividade notarial, dos princípios e normas atinentes a essa atividade e às
soluções de direito substantivo na garantia e cumprimento dos pressupostos de existência do título executivo.
Civil procedure legislation and successive reforms have made several changes to the rules contained therein in relation to various aspects of Portuguese civil procedure. One of these aspects has been the successive changes made to the list of executive titles. Of the various executive titles provided for in the Code of Civil Procedure, special focus is given to the one provided for in Article 703 (b) of Law 41/2013, of 26th June, which approved the Code of Civil Procedure currently in force. It follows from this rule that authentic or notarised documents, which imply recognition by a notary or by other entities or professionals with the competence to perform these acts, and whose documents imply the constitution or recognition of any obligation. Compared to the civil procedural legislation previously in force, the changes brought about by the aforementioned law were restrictive of the list of executive titles of an extrajudicial nature, prohibiting the admissibility of signed private documents in the list of executive titles. Authentic documents and notarised private documents are notarial acts. Of the list of notarial acts, the legislator did not expressly include the notarial act of recognizing a signature affixed to a private document in the list of enforceable titles. In this sense, the aim of this dissertation will be to reflect on the admissibility or inadmissibility of the private document with a recognized/acknowledged signature as a document that can be included in the list of enforceable titles, taking into account not only historical developments and solutions from other legal systems, but also the suitability and importance of the notarial activity, the principles and rules relating to this activity and the substantive law solutions for guaranteeing and fulfilling the conditions for the existence of the enforceable title.
Civil procedure legislation and successive reforms have made several changes to the rules contained therein in relation to various aspects of Portuguese civil procedure. One of these aspects has been the successive changes made to the list of executive titles. Of the various executive titles provided for in the Code of Civil Procedure, special focus is given to the one provided for in Article 703 (b) of Law 41/2013, of 26th June, which approved the Code of Civil Procedure currently in force. It follows from this rule that authentic or notarised documents, which imply recognition by a notary or by other entities or professionals with the competence to perform these acts, and whose documents imply the constitution or recognition of any obligation. Compared to the civil procedural legislation previously in force, the changes brought about by the aforementioned law were restrictive of the list of executive titles of an extrajudicial nature, prohibiting the admissibility of signed private documents in the list of executive titles. Authentic documents and notarised private documents are notarial acts. Of the list of notarial acts, the legislator did not expressly include the notarial act of recognizing a signature affixed to a private document in the list of enforceable titles. In this sense, the aim of this dissertation will be to reflect on the admissibility or inadmissibility of the private document with a recognized/acknowledged signature as a document that can be included in the list of enforceable titles, taking into account not only historical developments and solutions from other legal systems, but also the suitability and importance of the notarial activity, the principles and rules relating to this activity and the substantive law solutions for guaranteeing and fulfilling the conditions for the existence of the enforceable title.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Reconhecimento de assinatura Documento autêntico Título executivo Prova documental Teses de mestrado - 2024 Acknowledged signature Authentic Act Enforceable title Documentary evidence