Repository logo
 
Publication

Morphology of the dentin–resin interface yielded by twostep etch-and-rinse adhesives with different solvents

dc.contributor.authorFerreira, João C.
dc.contributor.authorPires, Patrícia T.
dc.contributor.authorAzevedo, Álvaro F. de
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Sofia Arantes e
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Mário J.
dc.contributor.authorMelo, Paulo R. de
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-08T12:04:03Z
dc.date.available2018-11-08T12:04:03Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractAim: The study aimed to analyze the morphology of the dentin– resin interface yielded by two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive systems with different solvents and compositions. Materials and methods: A total of 32 dentine disks were prepared and randomly assigned to four groups of one-bottle etchand- rinse adhesive systems containing different solvents: group I, Adper Scotchbond-1XT™ (ethanol/water); group II, XP-Bond™ (tertiary butanol); group III, Prime and Bond NT® (acetone); and group IV, One Coat bond® (5% water). Adhesive systems were applied onto dentin disks, which were then thermal cycled, divided into two hemi-disks (n = 16), and prepared for field-emission scanning electron microscopy to examine the dentin–resin interdiffusion zone. Microphotographs were scanned and data were processed. Data were compared with analysis of variance multivariant test after Kolmogorov–Smirnov and Shapiro–Wilk tests using Statistic Package for the Social Sciences. Results: The adhesive layer thickness average found was group I: 45.9 ± 13.41 μm, group II: 20.6 ± 16.32 μm, group III: 17.7 ± 11.75 μm, and group IV: 50.7 ± 27.81 μm. Significant differences were found between groups I and IV and groups II and III (p<0.000). Groups I (3.23 ± 0.53 μm) and II (3.13 ± 0.73 μm) yielded significantly thicker hybrid layers than groups III (2.53 ± 0.50 μm) and IV (1.84 ± 0.27 μm) (p<0.003). Group III presented a less homogeneous hybrid layer, with some gaps. Tag length average was greater in groups II (111.0 ± 36.92 μm) and IV (128.9 ± 78.38 μm) than in groups I (61.5 ± 18.10 μm) and III (68.6 ± 15.84 μm) (p<0.008). Conclusion: Adhesives systems with different solvents led to significant differences in the dentin–resin interface morphology.pt_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
dc.identifier.citationFerreira JC, Pires PT, Azevedo AF, et al. Morphology of the dentin–resin interface yielded by twostep etch-and-rinse adhesives with different solvents. The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice. 2017;18(10):947-958.pt_PT
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10451/35303
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.subjectAdhesive layerpt_PT
dc.subjectEtch-and-rinse adhesivespt_PT
dc.subjectHybrid layerpt_PT
dc.subjectResin tagspt_PT
dc.subjectSolventspt_PT
dc.titleMorphology of the dentin–resin interface yielded by twostep etch-and-rinse adhesives with different solventspt_PT
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
rcaap.rightsrestrictedAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typearticlept_PT

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
WU190_OLIs M_AI_2017.pdf
Size:
552.56 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.2 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: