A carregar...
Publicação
Estilos de vinculação e mecanismos de defesa : um estudo com jovens adultos
| Nome: | Descrição: | Tamanho: | Formato: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 861.15 KB | Adobe PDF |
Orientador(es)
Resumo(s)
O presente trabalho foca-se no estudo da relação entre os estilos de vinculação, mecanismos de defesa e estilos defensivos, em jovens adultos com mais de 18 anos. Tem como objetivos: Analisar as diferenças nos estilos defensivos em função do tipo de vinculação – Segura ou Insegura (1); Analisar a relação entre estilos de vinculação e estilos defensivos (2); Analisar as relações entre as dimensões da vinculação e estilos defensivos (3); Analisar Diferenças dos vários mecanismos de defesa em função do estilo de vinculação (4); Analisar a relação entre Dimensões da Vinculação e Defesas (5). Foram utilizados 3 instrumentos: Um questionário Sociodemográfico; O questionário Experiência em Relações Próximas – Experience in Close Relations – traduzido e adaptado em Portugal por Moreira e colegas (2006); e finalmente o Questionário de Estilo Defensivo – Defensive Style Questionnaire-40 (Andrews, Singh, & Bond, 1993). Participaram neste estudo 110 indivíduos, masculinos e femininos, com idades superiores a 18 anos. Os resultados permitiram verificar que: (1) Existem correlações significativas entre estilos de vinculação e estilos defensivos; (2) Existem correlações significativas entre dimensões da vinculação e estilos defensivos; (3) Existem diferenças significativas nos estilos de defensivos em função do tipo de vinculação; (4) Existem diferenças significativas em vários mecanismos de defesa em função do estilo de vinculação; Existem correlações significativas entre dimensões da vinculação e vários mecanismos de defesa. Os resultados são discutidos com base na literatura existente. São referidas as limitações do estudo e propostas para investigações futuras.
The present research focuses on the study of the relation between attachment styles, defense mechanisms and defensive styles, in young adults. The aims of this study are: to analyze differences in the defensive styles in function of the type of attachment – Secure or Insecure (1); to analyze the relation between attachment styles and defensive styles (2); to analyze the relation between attachment dimensions and defensive styles (3); to analyze differences in the defense mechanisms in function of the attachment style (4); to analyze the relation between attachment dimensions and defense mechanisms (5). For this investigation 3 different instruments were used: a Sociodemographic questionnaire; The Experience in Close Relations Questionnaire translated and adapted in Portugal by Moreira and colleagues (2006); and finally the Defensive Style Questionnaire-40 (Andrews, Singh, & Bond, 1993). 110 subjects, over 18 years of age, male and female participated in this study. The results revealed that: (1) there were differences in the defensive styles in function of the type of attachment; (2) there were meaningful correlations between attachment styles and defensive styles; (3) there were meaningful correlations between attachment dimensions and defensive styles; (4) there were differences in multiple defense mechanisms in function of the attachment style; (5) there were significant correlations between the attachment dimensions and various defense mechanisms. These results are discussed in the light of the existing literature. Study limitations and suggestions for further investigations are presented.
The present research focuses on the study of the relation between attachment styles, defense mechanisms and defensive styles, in young adults. The aims of this study are: to analyze differences in the defensive styles in function of the type of attachment – Secure or Insecure (1); to analyze the relation between attachment styles and defensive styles (2); to analyze the relation between attachment dimensions and defensive styles (3); to analyze differences in the defense mechanisms in function of the attachment style (4); to analyze the relation between attachment dimensions and defense mechanisms (5). For this investigation 3 different instruments were used: a Sociodemographic questionnaire; The Experience in Close Relations Questionnaire translated and adapted in Portugal by Moreira and colleagues (2006); and finally the Defensive Style Questionnaire-40 (Andrews, Singh, & Bond, 1993). 110 subjects, over 18 years of age, male and female participated in this study. The results revealed that: (1) there were differences in the defensive styles in function of the type of attachment; (2) there were meaningful correlations between attachment styles and defensive styles; (3) there were meaningful correlations between attachment dimensions and defensive styles; (4) there were differences in multiple defense mechanisms in function of the attachment style; (5) there were significant correlations between the attachment dimensions and various defense mechanisms. These results are discussed in the light of the existing literature. Study limitations and suggestions for further investigations are presented.
Descrição
Tese de mestrado, Psicologia (Secção de Psicologia Clínica e da Saúde - Núcleo de Psicologia Clínica Dinâmica), Universidade de Lisboa, Faculdade de Psicologia, 2014
Palavras-chave
Vinculação Mecanismos de defesa Jovens adultos Teses de mestrado - 2014