| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 760.15 KB | Adobe PDF |
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
Much of the empirical research on corruption for the past 45 years has focused on perception-based definitions and measurements. Citizens’ perceptions, their attitudes and (self)reported experiences of corruption have been widely studied through different perception-based measures obtained in surveys, interviews, and experiments applied to citizens in general, and experts, business leaders, politicians, or public officials. Notwithstanding the significant progress made to understand the complexity of citizens’ understandings, judgements and practices, we are still unable to decipher by what criteria they establish what is or is not corruption and what types of corruption are susceptible of being condemned/tolerated. This paper makes an innovative contribution to fill this gap. We propose a methodological design to identify and measure different perception-based definitions of corruption based on two contrasting normative perspectives: deontological and consequentialist ethics. We identified four groups: the Virtuous; the Intransigent; the Pragmatic; and the Hypocrite. Using survey data from a national sample of Portuguese citizens, we employ discriminant analysis and logistic regression models to differentiate individual profiles in terms of process- and outcome-based social definitions of corruption and explore the explanatory factors that account for these different conceptualisations and their different degree of tolerance towards corruption.
Description
Keywords
Attitudes Consequentialism Corruption Deontology Profiles Tolerance
Pedagogical Context
Citation
Megías, A., de Sousa, L., Jiménez-Sánchez, F. (2023). Deontological and Consequentialist Ethics and Attitudes Towards Corruption: A Survey Data Analysis. Social Indicators Research, Vol. 170, 507-541.
Publisher
Springer Link