A carregar...
Publicação
Métodos utilizados em plataformas digitais para a recomendação de objetivos personalizados de atividade física : uma revisão sistemática
| Nome: | Descrição: | Tamanho: | Formato: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 384.88 KB | Adobe PDF |
Autores
Orientador(es)
Resumo(s)
Objetivo: Esta revisão sistemática tem como objetivo sintetizar as evidências a partir de ensaios clínicos aleatorizados controlados e mapear os diferentes métodos de definição de objetivos em aplicações de promoção de atividade física que têm sido usados na literatura. Método: Os artigos selecionados foram obtidos a partir de duas revisões sistemáticas publicadas, “The effectiveness of digital interventions for increasing physical activity in individuals of low socioeconomic status: a systematic review and meta-analysis” (Western et al., 2021) e “Associations between digital health intervention engagement, physical activity, and sedentary behavior: Systematic review and meta-analysis” (McLaughlin et al., 2021). O método utilizado para o desenvolvimento dos critérios de inclusão e exclusão da seleção dos estudos incluídos para esta revisão, consistiu na population, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO). Resultados: Trinta e sete artigos cumpriram com os critérios de elegibilidade. A maioria dos estudos analisados focou na prática de atividade física de intensidade moderada a vigorosa, a sua quantificação foi realizada por diversos instrumentos, incluindo pedómetros, acelerómetros e consolas de jogos. Alguns estudos mencionaram o uso de algoritmos específicos, como o de Choi e o Actilife. O feedback foi fornecido por diversos meios incluindo presencialmente, via telemóvel e por plataformas online. A automonitorização, principalmente através de questionários, foi a estratégia mais utilizada permitindo que os indivíduos monitorizassem os seus próprios comportamentos, facilitando a criação do feedback personalizado. Conclusão: Os estudos revistos demonstram que os dispositivos mais utilizados foram o acelerómetro e o pedómetro para avaliarem a atividade física. Todavia, é necessária uma descrição mais rigorosa quanto aos métodos de definição de objetivos e os algoritmos utilizados.
Purpose: This systematic review aims to synthesize the evidence from randomized controlled clinical trials and map the different goal-setting methods in physical activity promotion applications that have been used in the literature. Methods: The selected articles were obtained from two published systematic reviews, “The effectiveness of digital interventions for increasing physical activity in individuals of low socioeconomic status: a systematic review and meta-analysis” (Western et al., 2021) and “Associations between digital health intervention engagement, physical activity, and sedentary behavior: Systematic review and meta-analysis” (McLaughlin et al., 2021). The method used for the development of the inclusion and exclusion criteria for the selection of the studies included for this review, consisted of population, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO). Results: Thirty-seven articles met the eligibility criteria. Most of the studies analyzed focused on the practice of moderate to vigorous physical activity, its quantification was carried out by various instruments, including pedometers, accelerometers and game consoles. Some studies mentioned the use of specific algorithms, such as Choi’s and Actilife’s. Feedback was provided by various means including in person, via mobile phone and online platforms. Self-monitoring, mainly through questionnaires, was the most used strategy allowing individuals to monitor their own behaviors, facilitating the creation of personalized feedback. Conclusions: Digital platforms seem to use mostly the pedometer and the accelerometer to access physical activity. However, a more rigorous description is needed regarding the methods of goal setting and the algorithms used.
Purpose: This systematic review aims to synthesize the evidence from randomized controlled clinical trials and map the different goal-setting methods in physical activity promotion applications that have been used in the literature. Methods: The selected articles were obtained from two published systematic reviews, “The effectiveness of digital interventions for increasing physical activity in individuals of low socioeconomic status: a systematic review and meta-analysis” (Western et al., 2021) and “Associations between digital health intervention engagement, physical activity, and sedentary behavior: Systematic review and meta-analysis” (McLaughlin et al., 2021). The method used for the development of the inclusion and exclusion criteria for the selection of the studies included for this review, consisted of population, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO). Results: Thirty-seven articles met the eligibility criteria. Most of the studies analyzed focused on the practice of moderate to vigorous physical activity, its quantification was carried out by various instruments, including pedometers, accelerometers and game consoles. Some studies mentioned the use of specific algorithms, such as Choi’s and Actilife’s. Feedback was provided by various means including in person, via mobile phone and online platforms. Self-monitoring, mainly through questionnaires, was the most used strategy allowing individuals to monitor their own behaviors, facilitating the creation of personalized feedback. Conclusions: Digital platforms seem to use mostly the pedometer and the accelerometer to access physical activity. However, a more rigorous description is needed regarding the methods of goal setting and the algorithms used.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Revisão Sistemática Wearables Atividade Física Digital Health Intervention eHealth Intervenção Digital Alteração Comportamental Desigual na Saúde Plataformas Digitais RCT Systematic-review Physical Activity Digital Health Intervention Digital Intervention Behavior change Health Inequalities Digital Platform