Repository logo
 
Publication

Comparison of 3 supraspinatus tendon repair techniques : a 3D computational finite element analysis

2020Journal article Restricted access
Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorQuental, C.
dc.contributor.authorReis, J.
dc.contributor.authorFolgado, J.
dc.contributor.authorMonteiro, J.
dc.contributor.authorSarmento, M.
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-20T11:31:34Z
dc.date.available2021-07-20T11:31:34Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.descriptionCopyright © 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Grouppt_PT
dc.description.abstractConsidering that optimal contact area and pressure at the tendon-bone interface are associated with better footprint repair and outcomes, the aim of this study was to compare the performance of standard double-row, transosseous equivalent (TOE), and partial articular supraspinatus tendon avulsion (PASTA) techniques for the treatment of full-thickness tears of the supraspinatus tendon using 3D finite element models. Loading consisted, alternately, in a preloading of 10 N and 20 N of the sutures. The footprint coverage of the standard double-row, TOE, and PASTA techniques was estimated to represent 19%, 30%, and 35%, respectively, of the repair area. The average contact pressures followed an opposite trend, i.e., the largest was estimated for the standard double-row technique, whereas the lowest was estimated for the PASTA technique. Despite the present study advancing the computational modelling of rotator cuff repair, and the results being consistent with the literature, its findings must be evaluated cautiously, bearing in mind its limitations.pt_PT
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT), through IDMEC, under LAETA, project UIDB/50022/2020.pt_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
dc.identifier.citationComput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2020 Dec;23(16):1387-1394pt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/10255842.2020.1805441pt_PT
dc.identifier.eissn2168-1171
dc.identifier.issn2168-1163
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10451/49025
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.publisherInforma UKpt_PT
dc.relationAssociate Laboratory of Energy, Transports and Aeronautics
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.tandfonline.com/toc/gcmb20/currentpt_PT
dc.subjectSupraspinatuspt_PT
dc.subjectRotator cuff repairpt_PT
dc.subjectDouble rowpt_PT
dc.subjectTransosseous equivalentpt_PT
dc.subjectPASTA bridgept_PT
dc.subjectFinite element methodpt_PT
dc.titleComparison of 3 supraspinatus tendon repair techniques : a 3D computational finite element analysispt_PT
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.awardTitleAssociate Laboratory of Energy, Transports and Aeronautics
oaire.awardURIinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDB%2F50022%2F2020/PT
oaire.citation.endPage1394pt_PT
oaire.citation.issue16pt_PT
oaire.citation.startPage1387pt_PT
oaire.citation.titleComputer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineeringpt_PT
oaire.citation.volume23pt_PT
oaire.fundingStream6817 - DCRRNI ID
project.funder.identifierhttp://doi.org/10.13039/501100001871
project.funder.nameFundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
rcaap.rightsrestrictedAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typearticlept_PT
relation.isProjectOfPublicationae5c2fca-85f7-4b6c-8585-b51215d539a3
relation.isProjectOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryae5c2fca-85f7-4b6c-8585-b51215d539a3

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Comparison_supraspinatus.pdf
Size:
1.6 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

IMM - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais
FM - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais