Fernandes, Susana M.Adao-Serrano, MariaRodrigues, Ana RitaBelo, Patrícia2022-11-022022-11-022022Crit Care. 2022 Oct 27;26(1):3321364-8535http://hdl.handle.net/10451/54943© The Author(s) 2022. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.The recently published article by Kotfs et al. “The future of intensive care: delirium should no longer be an issue”, brought us great interest and although we agree with the authors’ perspective this is still far from being reality. Despite delirium increase report as an adverse event, it is often faced on daily practice as a patient’s “weakness” or an inevitability due to acute illness that we fail to avoid. Tis perspective precludes multidisciplinary team effort from targeting the modifiable components of delirium mentioned in the paper.engFuture without delirium: not quite there yet but we can start by prescribing touchjournal article10.1186/s13054-022-04147-11466-609X