Policiano, CatarinaReis-de-Carvalho, CatarinaClode, NunoGraça, Luís M.2020-12-092020-12-092019Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 Sep;240:187-1910301-2115http://hdl.handle.net/10451/45182© 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.Objective: To compare knowledge and practices surrounding third trimester screening of fetal growth restriction (FGR) in low risk pregnancies among Portuguese Gynecologists/Obstetricians (GOs) and General Practitioners (GPs). Primary outcome was to compare the proportion of GOs that consider the need of a third trimester ultrasound (estimation of fetal weight) for screening of FGR in low risk pregnancies and the best time to perform it with the corresponding proportion of GPs. Study design: We have conducted a prospective, observational cohort study based on application of surveys to GOs and GPs. Questionnaires were sent by e-mail to physicians and they filled them online. A second reminder e-mail was sent 7 days later. Recruitment was also done personally at scientific meetings. A total of 573 surveys were available for analysis, 298 corresponded to GOs and 275 to GPs. We used χ2 test to compare dichotomous variables and Kruskal-Wallis test for the comparison of ordinal variables. P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: The vast majority of GOs and GPs (93%) considered that third trimester ultrasound is useful and needed for surveillance of low risk pregnancy. A higher proportion of GOs (38%) selected 35th-37th weeks as the best time to perform the ultrasound compared to GPs (10%) (p < 0.001). GOs (51%) consider that symphysis-fundus distance is a measurement with moderate accuracy for screening of FGR while GPs (61%) attribute a low accuracy (p < 0.001). Fifty percent (50%) of GOs consider that performing a third trimester ultrasound will have no impact on cesarean delivery rate for fetal distress, while 41% of GPs consider that routine ultrasound will contribute to increase this rate (p < 0.001). The majority of GPs (52%) consider that routine ultrasound will contribute to diminish the admission rate to neonatal intensive care unit while GOs revealed a dichotomy with 43% of respondents reporting that it will diminish the rate and 40% that it will have no impact. Conclusion: Varied opinions among the clinicians included in our sample reflect the controversy that remains on the best screening of FGR in low risk pregnancies.engFetal growth restrictionLow risk pregnanciesOpinion of physiciansThird trimesterUltrasound screeningjournal article10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.07.009