Cruz, Maria Leonor García da2023-08-172023-08-172022CRUZ, Maria Leonor García da, “Emotion and rationality in the creation of the ideal courtier” in Creating through Mind and Emo-tions (Eds. Mário S. Ming Kong, M.Rosário Monteiro, M.João Pereira Neto), Leiden, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, pp. 439-445. ISBN 9780367279936; ISBN: 978-0-429-29907-0 (eBook). https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/oa-edit/10.1201/9780429299070/creating-mind-emotions-maria-jo%C3%A3o-pereira-neto-m%C3%A1rio-ming-kong-maria-ros%C3%A1rio-monteiro978-0-367-27993-6978-0-367-49538-1978-0-429-29907-0http://hdl.handle.net/10451/58914By starting our study with the Lembranças (memoirs) of D. Francisco de Portugal, Conde do Vimioso (c. 1545) as our main source and crossing-referencing it with other sixteen-century documents, we want to assess the meaning of the Court and the courtier in the 16th century. We are in the presence of a very revealing document on royal liberality in an ambiance where the sovereign is the unifying and uniting element but also a critic of the backstage constraints, namely of a game of promises not always fulfilled and of the existence of interest groups. It is a document with autobiographical data on a figure who was paramount in war, in diplomacy, and in arts, as well as in his senior functions as counselor and Vedor da Fazenda with a description of favors, posts at the palace and property, received or not, assessed in comparison with the favors distributed to others serving at the Court, both members and non-members of the nobility. In this dissertation, the truth of which has been verified, the environment in which a courtier lived is explained: the construction that the Court represents of a hierarchic and social-legal order established on Christian moral and political principles, therefore rationalized, to which the subjects of the sovereign submit themselves; the structure that the Court also embodies as a seat of prestige awakening opposing feelings of ambition and humility and causing affection and disaffection.engCourtCourtierLiberalityMeritGrievancebook parthttps://doi.org/10.1201/9780429299070-58