Santos, R.Menezes, Miguel NobreCarrilho-Ferreira, PedroCalhaz-Jorge, CarlosFrancisco, A. R.Oliveira, Eduardo Infante deDuarte, J.Cardoso, P.Torres, D.Aguiar-Ricardo, InêsRigueira, JoanaRodrigues, TiagoFerreira, Afonso NunesPinto, Fausto J.Canas da Silva, Pedro2022-01-142022-01-142020European Heart Journal, Volume 41, Issue Supplement_2, November 2020, ehaa946.14750195-668Xhttp://hdl.handle.net/10451/50815Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2020. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com. This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model)Distal left main (LM) PCIremains a challenge. One of the most debated issues is whether to use a single vs 2 stent provisional strategy. While most studies and guidelines favour a single stent strategy, the recent DK-CRUSH V trial has shown better results with a 2 stent strategy.engCoronary Artery DiseaseTreatment, RevascularizationOne stent versus two stents for distal LM PCI: insights from the experience of a high volume centerjournal article10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.14751522-9645