Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: http://hdl.handle.net/10451/56311
Registo completo
Campo DCValorIdioma
degois.publication.titleJournal of Neuroimagingpt_PT
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/15526569pt_PT
dc.contributor.authorEdwards, Christopher-
dc.contributor.authorDrumm, Brian-
dc.contributor.authorSiegler, James E.-
dc.contributor.authorSchonewille, Wouter J.-
dc.contributor.authorKlein, Piers-
dc.contributor.authorHuo, Xiaochuan-
dc.contributor.authorChen, Yimin-
dc.contributor.authorAbdalkader, Mohamad-
dc.contributor.authorQureshi, Muhammad M.-
dc.contributor.authorStrbian, Daniel-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Xinfeng-
dc.contributor.authorHu, Wei-
dc.contributor.authorJi, Xunming-
dc.contributor.authorLi, Chuanhui-
dc.contributor.authorFischer, Urs-
dc.contributor.authorNagel, Simon-
dc.contributor.authorPuetz, Volker-
dc.contributor.authorMichel, Patrik-
dc.contributor.authorAlemseged, Fana-
dc.contributor.authorSacco, Simona-
dc.contributor.authorYamagami, Hiroshi-
dc.contributor.authorYaghi, Shadi-
dc.contributor.authorStrambo, Davide-
dc.contributor.authorKristoffersen, Espen Saxhaug-
dc.contributor.authorSandset, Else C.-
dc.contributor.authorMikulik, Robert-
dc.contributor.authorTsivgoulis, Georgios-
dc.contributor.authorMasoud, Hesham E.-
dc.contributor.authorde Sousa, Diana Aguiar-
dc.contributor.authorMarto, João Pedro-
dc.contributor.authorLobotesis, Kyriakos-
dc.contributor.authorRoi, Dylan-
dc.contributor.authorBerberich, Anne-
dc.contributor.authorDemeestere, Jelle-
dc.contributor.authorMeinel, Thomas R.-
dc.contributor.authorRivera, Rodrigo-
dc.contributor.authorPoli, Sven-
dc.contributor.authorTon, Mai Duy-
dc.contributor.authorZhu, Yuyou-
dc.contributor.authorLi, Fengli-
dc.contributor.authorSang, Hongfei-
dc.contributor.authorThomalla, Götz-
dc.contributor.authorParsons, Mark-
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, Bruce C. V.-
dc.contributor.authorZaidat, Osama O.-
dc.contributor.authorChen, Hui‐Sheng-
dc.contributor.authorField, Thalia S.-
dc.contributor.authorRaymond, Jean-
dc.contributor.authorKaesmacher, Johannes-
dc.contributor.authorNogueira, Raul G.-
dc.contributor.authorJovin, Tudor G.-
dc.contributor.authorSun, Dapeng-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Raynald-
dc.contributor.authorQureshi, Adnan I.-
dc.contributor.authorQiu, Zhongming-
dc.contributor.authorMiao, Zhongrong-
dc.contributor.authorBanerjee, Soma-
dc.contributor.authorNguyen, Thanh N.-
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-14T15:27:06Z-
dc.date.available2023-02-14T15:27:06Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.citationJ Neuroimaging. 2023 Feb 13. doi: 10.1111/jon.13084pt_PT
dc.identifier.issn1051-2284-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10451/56311-
dc.description© 2023 American Society of Neuroimaging.pt_PT
dc.description.abstractBackground and purpose: Two early basilar artery occlusion (BAO) randomized controlled trials did not establish the superiority of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) over medical management. While many providers continue to recommend EVT for acute BAO, perceptions of equipoise in randomizing patients with BAO to EVT versus medical management may differ between clinician specialties. Methods: We conducted an international survey (January 18, 2022 to March 31, 2022) regarding management strategies in acute BAO prior to the announcement of two trials indicating the superiority of EVT, and compared responses between interventionalists (INTs) and non-interventionalists (nINTs). Selection practices for routine EVT and perceptions of equipoise regarding randomizing to medical management based on neuroimaging and clinical features were compared between the two groups using descriptive statistics. Results: Among the 1245 respondents (nINTs = 702), INTs more commonly believed that EVT was superior to medical management in acute BAO (98.5% vs. 95.1%, p < .01). A similar proportion of INTs and nINTs responded that they would not randomize a patient with BAO to EVT (29.4% vs. 26.7%), or that they would only under specific clinical circumstances (p = .45). Among respondents who would recommend EVT for BAO, there was no difference in the maximum prestroke disability, minimum stroke severity, or infarct burden on computed tomography between the two groups (p > .05), although nINTs more commonly preferred perfusion imaging (24.2% vs. 19.7%, p = .04). Among respondents who indicated they would randomize to medical management, INTs were more likely to randomize when the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale was ≥10 (15.9% vs. 6.9%, p < .01). Conclusions: Following the publication of two neutral clinical trials in BAO EVT, most stroke providers believed EVT to be superior to medical management in carefully selected patients, with most indicating they would not randomize a BAO patient to medical treatment. There were small differences in preference for advanced neuroimaging for patient selection, although these preferences were unsupported by clinical trial data at the time of the survey.pt_PT
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.publisherWileypt_PT
dc.rightsrestrictedAccesspt_PT
dc.subjectBasilar artery occlusionpt_PT
dc.subjectEndovascular therapypt_PT
dc.subjectIntravenous thrombolysispt_PT
dc.subjectMechanical thrombectomypt_PT
dc.titleBasilar artery occlusion management: specialist perspectives from an international surveypt_PT
dc.typearticlept_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jon.13084pt_PT
dc.identifier.eissn1552-6569-
Aparece nas colecções:FM - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
Basilar_artery.pdf972,05 kBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir    Acesso Restrito. Solicitar cópia ao autor!


FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInDiggGoogle BookmarksMySpace
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote 

Todos os registos no repositório estão protegidos por leis de copyright, com todos os direitos reservados.