Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: http://hdl.handle.net/10451/50466
Registo completo
Campo DCValorIdioma
degois.publication.titleJournal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Medicine, and Pathologypt_PT
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/journal-of-oral-and-maxillofacial-surgery-medicine-and-pathologypt_PT
dc.contributor.authorÂngelo, David-
dc.contributor.authorSanz, David-
dc.contributor.authorCardoso, Henrique José-
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-20T14:15:28Z-
dc.date.available2021-12-20T14:15:28Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationJ Oral Maxillofac Surg Med Pathol (2021)pt_PT
dc.identifier.issn2212-5558-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10451/50466-
dc.description© 2021 Asian AOMS, ASOMP, JSOP, JSOMS, JSOM, and JAMI. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.pt_PT
dc.description.abstractObjective: Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) discectomy is one of the most popular surgical techniques for patients with an unsalvageable disc. Previous studies have demonstrated predictable results of dis- cectomy with optimal results in pain reduction and maximum mouth opening (MMO) improvement. However, those studies had most of the times wide-ranging inclusion criteria. This study was therefore conducted to assess the role of unilateral TMJ discectomy in a well defined diagnosis. Methods: A 6-year prospective study was designed including patients treated with unilateral TMJ dis- cectomy without interposal material, preserving condyle and temporal fibrocartilage, for two specific intra-articular diagnosis: disc perforation and disc fragmentation. Results: A total of 19 patients were enrolled, with a mean age of 51.05 ± 13.71 (mean ± SD) years. Preoperative pain was 7.63 ± 1.89 (mean ± SD), MMO was 25.95 ± 10.27 mm (mean ± SD) and muscle tenderness (MT) was 2.53 ± 0.77 (mean ± SD). The most common diagnosis was disc perforation. After an average of 37.9 months of follow-up time (range from 10 to 71 months), a statistically significant improvement of pain (P < 0.0001), MMO (P < 0.0001) and MT (P = 0.00011) was observed. Postoperatively, 16 of 18 patients (89 %) showed a reduction in pain and improvement in MMO, fulfilling the criteria for a successful outcome of TMJ surgery. No second surgery was necessary. Conclusion: Unilateral TMJ discectomy without interposal material in patients with disc perforation or fragmentation seems to be an adequate technique. However, we encourage rigorous long-term studies and new preclinical trials to pursuit a disc substitute, as relevant preclinical trials have demonstrated significant degenerative changes after TMJ discectomy.pt_PT
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work is supported by Centro2020 through the Project reference: BIODISCUS (CENTRO-01-0247-FEDER-039969).pt_PT
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.publisherElsevierpt_PT
dc.relationCENTRO-01-0247-FEDER-039969pt_PT
dc.rightsrestrictedAccesspt_PT
dc.subjectTemporomandibular jointpt_PT
dc.subjectTMJ discectomypt_PT
dc.subjectTMJ meniscectomypt_PT
dc.subjectTMJ surgerypt_PT
dc.subjectProspective studypt_PT
dc.titleUnilateral temporomandibular joint discectomy without interposal material in patients with disc perforation or fragmentation: a prospective studypt_PT
dc.typearticlept_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ajoms.2021.12.005pt_PT
dc.identifier.eissn2212-5566-
Aparece nas colecções:FM - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
Unilateral_temporomandibular.pdf902,33 kBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir    Acesso Restrito. Solicitar cópia ao autor!


FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInDiggGoogle BookmarksMySpace
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote 

Todos os registos no repositório estão protegidos por leis de copyright, com todos os direitos reservados.