Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: http://hdl.handle.net/10451/45184
Registo completo
Campo DCValorIdioma
degois.publication.firstPage554pt_PT
degois.publication.issue5pt_PT
degois.publication.lastPage558pt_PT
degois.publication.titleActa Médica Portuguesapt_PT
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/indexpt_PT
dc.contributor.authorVaz de Macedo, Carolina-
dc.contributor.authorClode, Nuno-
dc.contributor.authorGraça, Luís M.-
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-09T13:51:10Z-
dc.date.available2020-12-09T13:51:10Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationActa Med Port. 2015 Sep-Oct;28(5):554-558pt_PT
dc.identifier.issn0870-399X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10451/45184-
dc.descriptionCopyright © Ordem dos Médicos 2015pt_PT
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: External cephalic version is a procedure of fetal rotation to a cephalic presentation through manoeuvres applied to the maternal abdomen. There are several prognostic factors described in literature for external cephalic version success and prediction scores have been proposed, but their true implication in clinical practice is controversial. We aim to identify possible factors that could contribute to the success of an external cephalic version attempt in our population. Material and methods: We retrospectively examined 207 consecutive external cephalic version attempts under tocolysis conducted between January 1997 and July 2012. We consulted the department's database for the following variables: race, age, parity, maternal body mass index, gestational age, estimated fetal weight, breech category, placental location and amniotic fluid index. We performed descriptive and analytical statistics for each variable and binary logistic regression. Results: External cephalic version was successful in 46.9% of cases (97/207). None of the included variables was associated with the outcome of external cephalic version attempts after adjustment for confounding factors. Discussion: We present a success rate similar to what has been previously described in literature. However, in contrast to previous authors, we could not associate any of the analysed variables with success of the external cephalic version attempt. We believe this discrepancy is partly related to the type of statistical analysis performed. Conclusions: Even though there are numerous prognostic factors identified for the success in external cephalic version, care must be taken when counselling and selecting patients for this procedure. The data obtained suggests that external cephalic version should continue being offered to all eligible patients regardless of prognostic factors for success.pt_PT
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.publisherOrdem dos Médicospt_PT
dc.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/pt_PT
dc.subjectBreech presentationpt_PT
dc.subjectPregnancypt_PT
dc.subjectTocolysispt_PT
dc.subjectTreatment outcomept_PT
dc.subjectVersion, fetalpt_PT
dc.titlePrediction of success in external cephalic version under tocolysis : still a challengept_PT
dc.title.alternativePredição de sucesso na versão cefálica externa sob tocólise : ainda um desafiopt_PT
dc.typearticlept_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
degois.publication.volume28pt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.20344/amp.6179pt_PT
dc.identifier.eissn1646-0758-
Aparece nas colecções:FM - Artigos em Revistas Nacionais

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
Prediction_success.pdf463,24 kBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir


FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInDiggGoogle BookmarksMySpace
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote 

Todos os registos no repositório estão protegidos por leis de copyright, com todos os direitos reservados.