Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: http://hdl.handle.net/10451/28337
Registo completo
Campo DCValorIdioma
degois.publication.firstPage59pt_PT
degois.publication.issue44pt_PT
degois.publication.lastPage73pt_PT
degois.publication.titleDisputatiopt_PT
dc.relation.publisherversionwww.disputatio.compt_PT
dc.contributor.authorPark, Seungbae-
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-12T22:58:26Z-
dc.date.available2017-07-12T22:58:26Z-
dc.date.issued2017-05-
dc.identifier.issn0873-626X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10451/28337-
dc.description.abstractThe no-miracles argument (Putnam 1975) holds that science is successful because successful theories are (approximately) true. Frost-Arnold (2010) objects that this argument is unacceptable because it generates neither new predictions nor unifications. It is similar to the unacceptable explanation that opium puts people to sleep because it has a dormative virtue. I reply that on close examination, realism explains not only why some theories are successful but also why successful theories exist in current science. Therefore, it unifies the disparate phenomena.pt_PT
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.publisherUniversidade de Lisboa, Faculdade de Letras, Centro de Filosofiapt_PT
dc.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
dc.subjectNaturalismpt_PT
dc.subjectNo-miracles argumentpt_PT
dc.subjectScientific realismpt_PT
dc.subjectSuccess of sciencept_PT
dc.subjectunificationpt_PT
dc.titleThe Unificatory Power of Scientific Realismpt_PT
dc.typearticlept_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
degois.publication.volumeIXpt_PT
Aparece nas colecções:CFUL - Disputatio - Volume 9 - 2017

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
Park_The Unificatory Power of Scientific Realism.pdf141,38 kBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir


FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInDiggGoogle BookmarksMySpace
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote 

Todos os registos no repositório estão protegidos por leis de copyright, com todos os direitos reservados.