| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 186.09 KB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
Throughout his philosophical career, Michael Dummett held firmly two theses: (I) the theory of meaning has a central position in philosophy and all other forms of philosophical inquiry rest upon semantic analysis, in particular semantic issues replace traditional metaphysical issues; (II) the theory of meaning is a theory of understanding. I will defend neither of them. However, I will argue that there is an important lesson we can learn by reflecting on the link between linguistic competence and semantics, which I take to be an important part of Dummett’s legacy in philosophy of language. I discuss this point in relation to Cappelen and Lepore’s criticism of Incompleteness Arguments.
Description
Keywords
Semantics Pragmatics Metaphysics
Pedagogical Context
Citation
Publisher
Universidade de Lisboa, Faculdade de Letras, Centro de Filosofia
