Repository logo
 
Publication

Editors are biased too: An extension of Fox et al. (2023)'s analysis makes the case for triple-blind review

dc.contributor.authorSrivastava, Diane S.
dc.contributor.authorBernardino, Joana
dc.contributor.authorMarques, Ana Teresa
dc.contributor.authorProença-Ferreira, António
dc.contributor.authorFilipe, Ana Filipa
dc.contributor.authorBorda-de-Água, Luís
dc.contributor.authorGameiro, João
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-14T13:27:19Z
dc.date.available2025-07-14T13:27:19Z
dc.date.issued2024-02
dc.description.abstract1. Functional Ecology conducted a randomised trial comparing single- and double- blind peer review; a recent analysis of this data found substantial evidence for bias by reviewers. 2. We show that this dataset can also be analysed for editor bias, after controlling for both reviewer bias and paper quality. 3. Our analysis shows that editors tend to be more likely to invite high-scoring man- uscripts for revision or resubmission when the first author is a man from a coun- try with a very high Human Development Index (HDI); first authors who were women or not from very high HDI countries were more likely to be rejected at this stage. 4. We propose that journals consider a triple-blind review process where neither editors nor reviewers know the identity of authors, and authors do not know the identity of reviewers nor editors.pt_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
dc.identifier.citationSrivastava, Diane S., et al. «Editors Are Biased Too: An Extension of Fox et al. (2023)’s Analysis Makes the Case for Triple‐blind Review». Functional Ecology, vol. 38, n.o 2, fevereiro de 2024, pp. 278–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.14483pt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1365-2435.14483pt_PT
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/102155
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.publisherWileypt_PT
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/pt_PT
dc.subjectequity in sciencept_PT
dc.subjectgenderpt_PT
dc.subjectnationalitypt_PT
dc.subjectpublishing ethicspt_PT
dc.subjectscientific review processpt_PT
dc.titleEditors are biased too: An extension of Fox et al. (2023)'s analysis makes the case for triple-blind reviewpt_PT
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.awardURIinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT//SFRH%2FBD%2F109242%2F2015/PT
oaire.citation.endPage283pt_PT
oaire.citation.issue2pt_PT
oaire.citation.startPage278pt_PT
oaire.citation.titleFunctional Ecologypt_PT
oaire.citation.volume38pt_PT
person.familyNameBernardino
person.familyNameMarques
person.familyNameda Silva Pereira Machado Filipe
person.familyNameGameiro
person.givenNameJoana
person.givenNameAna Teresa
person.givenNameAna Filipa
person.givenNameJoão
person.identifierJ-2585-2014
person.identifier2AcpLhMAAAAJ&hl
person.identifier.ciencia-id201D-8776-1F82
person.identifier.ciencia-id2A1A-7601-8854
person.identifier.ciencia-idAC1E-1FEE-30D5
person.identifier.ciencia-idBB13-2F49-8C1B
person.identifier.orcid0000-0001-9460-7214
person.identifier.orcid0000-0003-3279-643X
person.identifier.orcid0000-0001-7862-2676
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-9871-9763
person.identifier.scopus-author-id9234678800
person.identifier.scopus-author-id7003735153
project.funder.identifierhttp://doi.org/10.13039/501100001871
project.funder.nameFundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
rcaap.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typearticlept_PT
relation.isAuthorOfPublicatione27f8e5e-8c59-47fe-9f73-b943e9ae2f10
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationd2eb2ab5-79c0-4db3-aa77-a4749ea62478
relation.isAuthorOfPublication03e19bcf-6260-48ad-8fb4-b73a115e4b6f
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationcbf6bf8d-e261-4add-9b16-a5a7c6950f7e
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery03e19bcf-6260-48ad-8fb4-b73a115e4b6f
relation.isProjectOfPublication5b651ebc-d6b4-4a2d-9f26-fdfde7fa9e75
relation.isProjectOfPublication.latestForDiscovery5b651ebc-d6b4-4a2d-9f26-fdfde7fa9e75

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Functional Ecology - 2024 - Srivastava - Editors are biased too An extension of Fox et al 2023 s analysis makes the.pdf
Size:
440.65 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.2 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: