| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 231.31 KB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
This paper defends the thesis that counterfactuals are strict conditionals. Its purpose is to show that there is a coherent view according to which counterfactuals are strict conditionals whose antecedent is stated elliptically. Section 1 introduces the view. Section 2 outlines a reply to the main argument against the thesis that counterfactuals are strict conditionals. Section 3 compares the view with a proposal due to Åqvist, which may be regarded as its direct predecessor. Section 4 explains how the view differs from contextualist strict conditional accounts of counterfactuals. Finally, section 5 addresses the thorny issue of disjunctive antecedents.
Description
Keywords
Counterfactuals Strict conditionals Modal logic Counterfactual fallacies Disjunctive antecedents
Pedagogical Context
Citation
Publisher
Universidade de Lisboa, Faculdade de Letras, Centro de Filosofia
