Logo do repositório
 
Publicação

Methods for conducting international Delphi surveys to optimise global participation in core outcome set development: a case study in gastric cancer informed by a comprehensive literature review

dc.contributor.authorAlkhaffaf, Bilal
dc.contributor.authorBlazeby, Jane M.
dc.contributor.authorMetryka, Aleksandra
dc.contributor.authorGlenny, Anne-Marie
dc.contributor.authorAdeyeye, Ademola
dc.contributor.authorCosta, Paulo M.
dc.contributor.authordel Val, Ismael Diez
dc.contributor.authorGisbertz, Suzanne S.
dc.contributor.authorGuner, Ali
dc.contributor.authorLaw, Simon
dc.contributor.authorLee, Hyuk-Joon
dc.contributor.authorLi, Ziyu
dc.contributor.authorNakada, Koji
dc.contributor.authorNuñez, Rafael Mauricio Restrepo
dc.contributor.authorReim, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorReynolds, John V.
dc.contributor.authorVorwald, Peter
dc.contributor.authorZanotti, Daniela
dc.contributor.authorAllum, William
dc.contributor.authorChaudry, M. Asif
dc.contributor.authorGriffiths, Ewen
dc.contributor.authorWilliamson, Paula R.
dc.contributor.authorBruce, Iain A.
dc.contributor.authorLi, Shuangxi
dc.contributor.authorHe, Yu-long
dc.contributor.authorXu, Zekuan
dc.contributor.authorXue, Yingwei
dc.contributor.authorLiang, Han
dc.contributor.authorLi, Guoxin
dc.contributor.authorZhao, Enhao
dc.contributor.authorNeumann, Philipp
dc.contributor.authorO’Neill, Linda
dc.contributor.authorGuinan, Emer
dc.contributor.authorBaiocchi, Gian Luca
dc.contributor.authorde Manzoni, Giovanni
dc.contributor.authorHagens, Eliza R. C.
dc.contributor.authorvan Berge Henegouwen, Mark I.
dc.contributor.authorLages, Patrícia
dc.contributor.authorOnofre, Susana
dc.contributor.authorCabañas, Gabriel Salcedo
dc.contributor.authorGonzalez, Maria Posada
dc.contributor.authorCampos, Cristina Marin
dc.contributor.authorCandas, Bahar
dc.contributor.authorBaki, Bahadır Emre
dc.contributor.authorBodur, Muhammed Selim
dc.contributor.authorYildirim, Reyyan
dc.contributor.authorCekic, Arif Burak
dc.contributor.authorBeuscart, Jean-Baptiste
dc.contributor.authorHorbach, Sophie
dc.contributor.authorMecoli, Christopher
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Toby O.
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-16T16:00:20Z
dc.date.available2021-09-16T16:00:20Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.descriptionCopyright © 2021, The Author(s) Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.pt_PT
dc.description.abstractBackground: Core outcome sets (COS) should be relevant to key stakeholders and widely applicable and usable. Ideally, they are developed for international use to allow optimal data synthesis from trials. Electronic Delphi surveys are commonly used to facilitate global participation; however, this has limitations. It is common for these surveys to be conducted in a single language potentially excluding those not fluent in that tongue. The aim of this study is to summarise current approaches for optimising international participation in Delphi studies and make recommendations for future practice. Methods: A comprehensive literature review of current approaches to translating Delphi surveys for COS development was undertaken. A standardised methodology adapted from international guidance derived from 12 major sets of translation guidelines in the field of outcome reporting was developed. As a case study, this was applied to a COS project for surgical trials in gastric cancer to translate a Delphi survey into 7 target languages from regions active in gastric cancer research. Results: Three hundred thirty-two abstracts were screened and four studies addressing COS development in rheumatoid and osteoarthritis, vascular malformations and polypharmacy were eligible for inclusion. There was wide variation in methodological approaches to translation, including the number of forward translations, the inclusion of back translation, the employment of cognitive debriefing and how discrepancies and disagreements were handled. Important considerations were identified during the development of the gastric cancer survey including establishing translation groups, timelines, understanding financial implications, strategies to maximise recruitment and regulatory approvals. The methodological approach to translating the Delphi surveys was easily reproducible by local collaborators and resulted in an additional 637 participants to the 315 recruited to complete the source language survey. Ninety-nine per cent of patients and 97% of healthcare professionals from non-English-speaking regions used translated surveys. Conclusion: Consideration of the issues described will improve planning by other COS developers and can be used to widen international participation from both patients and healthcare professionals.pt_PT
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study is funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Doctoral Research Fellowship Grant (DRF-2015-08-023). JMB is partially funded by the NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre and the MRC ConDUCT-II Hub for Trials Methodology Research. PRW was funded by the MRC North West Hub for Trials Methodology Research (Grant ref: MR/K025635/01).pt_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
dc.identifier.citationTrials. 2021 Jun 21;22(1):410pt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13063-021-05338-xpt_PT
dc.identifier.eissn1745-6215
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10451/49533
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.publisherSpringer Naturept_PT
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://trialsjournal.biomedcentral.com/pt_PT
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt_PT
dc.titleMethods for conducting international Delphi surveys to optimise global participation in core outcome set development: a case study in gastric cancer informed by a comprehensive literature reviewpt_PT
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.issue1pt_PT
oaire.citation.titleTrialspt_PT
oaire.citation.volume22pt_PT
person.familyNameCosta
person.givenNamePaulo Matos
person.identifier.ciencia-id0415-4404-DDBE
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-7550-8285
person.identifier.ridABD-1573-2021
person.identifier.scopus-author-id55977165500
rcaap.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typearticlept_PT
relation.isAuthorOfPublication7f62714b-b0f1-4d22-a3a5-de04bc736cca
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery7f62714b-b0f1-4d22-a3a5-de04bc736cca

Ficheiros

Principais
A mostrar 1 - 1 de 1
A carregar...
Miniatura
Nome:
Methods_conducting.pdf
Tamanho:
1.04 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format