Logo do repositório
 
Publicação

Comparing the performance of two camera trap-based methods to survey small mustelids

dc.contributor.authorBarros, Ana Luisa
dc.contributor.authorMarques, Margarida
dc.contributor.authorAlcobia, Sandra
dc.contributor.authorMacKenzie, Darryl I.
dc.contributor.authorSantos-Reis, Margarida
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-19T12:41:00Z
dc.date.available2024-12-19T12:41:00Z
dc.date.issued2024-03
dc.description.abstractSmall mustelids are an understudied group partly due to the challenges in detecting and monitoring their populations. Despite the classification as Least Concern for several small mustelid species, some studies indicate a population decline in parts of their range. Therefore, efficient and group-specific methods are essential to support monitoring efforts. Camera traps are widely used, particularly to monitor cryptic and nocturnal species such as most carnivores. However, they tend to miss small-sized and fast-moving species due to the sensitivity of the passive infrared sensor. The Mostela is a device which consists of a camera trap and a tracking tunnel inside a wooden box, designed specifically to detect small mustelids. Here, we propose testing the performance of this device and comparing it to a tree-mounted camera trap, using the least weasel (M. nivalis) as a case study. We used multi-scale occupancy models to estimate differences in the detection probability between devices. Although both methods detected the least weasel, the detection probability was higher with the Mostela (0.8, BCI: 0.52–0.97 vs 0.2, BCI: 0.03–0.48). Furthermore, we obtained a higher trapping rate when using a shorter distance between sampling stations (∼350 m). Although the Mostela performed better at detecting the weasel, the number of independent events was low (N = 11). Therefore, we present recommendations in terms of deployment and future research since the development and testing of new methods are essential for the conservation efforts of small mustelids.pt_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
dc.identifier.citationBarros, A. L., Marques, M., Alcobia, S., MacKenzie, D. I., & Santos-Reis, M. (2024). Comparing the performance of two camera trap-based methods to survey small mustelids. Basic and Applied Ecology, 75, 18–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2024.01.004pt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.baae.2024.01.004pt_PT
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/96511
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.publisherElsevierpt_PT
dc.relationFCT - Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (UIDB/00329/2020; DOI 10.54499/UIDB/00329/2020)pt_PT
dc.relationPORBIOTA - E-Infraestrutura Portuguesa de Informação e Investigação em Biodiversidade (Project nr. 22127)pt_PT
dc.relationLTsER Montado platform (http://www.ltsermontado.pt/) (LTER_EU_PT_001)pt_PT
dc.relationFCT SFRH/BD/147206/2019pt_PT
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt_PT
dc.titleComparing the performance of two camera trap-based methods to survey small mustelidspt_PT
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage25pt_PT
oaire.citation.startPage18pt_PT
oaire.citation.titleBasic and Applied Ecologypt_PT
oaire.citation.volume75pt_PT
person.familyNameBarros
person.familyNameSantos-Reis
person.givenNameAna Luisa
person.givenNameMargarida
person.identifier.ciencia-id4911-7756-340F
person.identifier.orcid0009-0005-4730-3468
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-0337-963X
person.identifier.scopus-author-id6603189806
rcaap.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typearticlept_PT
relation.isAuthorOfPublication52e0d5f2-e06b-4a67-b7fa-ae3d0502b75a
relation.isAuthorOfPublication7b16b1ea-769c-4c3c-a2f5-b10bf4077f06
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery7b16b1ea-769c-4c3c-a2f5-b10bf4077f06

Ficheiros

Principais
A mostrar 1 - 1 de 1
A carregar...
Miniatura
Nome:
1-s2.0-S1439179124000100-main.pdf
Tamanho:
2.02 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Licença
A mostrar 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura indisponível
Nome:
license.txt
Tamanho:
1.2 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descrição: